solve the dispute on its merits

简明释义

根据是非曲直解决纠纷

英英释义

例句

1.To achieve a lasting resolution, the team agreed to solve the dispute on its merits instead of getting sidetracked by emotions.

为了实现持久的解决方案，团队同意根据案件本身的实质来解决争端，而不是被情绪左右。

2.The arbitrator decided to solve the dispute on its merits, focusing on the facts rather than procedural issues.

仲裁员决定根据案件本身的实质来解决争端，专注于事实而不是程序问题。

3.The company’s legal counsel advised them to solve the dispute on its merits to avoid unnecessary delays.

公司的法律顾问建议他们根据案件本身的实质来解决争端，以避免不必要的延误。

4.The mediation process aimed to solve the dispute on its merits, allowing both parties to present their cases fully.

调解过程旨在根据案件本身的实质来解决争端，让双方充分陈述自己的观点。

5.In court, the judge emphasized the need to solve the dispute on its merits to ensure a fair outcome.

法官在法庭上强调需要根据案件本身的实质来解决争端以确保公正的结果。

作文

In any conflict or disagreement, whether in personal relationships, business, or legal matters, it is crucial to find a resolution that is fair and just. One effective approach to achieve this is to solve the dispute on its merits. This phrase implies that the resolution of the conflict should be based on the inherent rights and wrongs of the case, rather than on external factors such as emotions, biases, or power dynamics.When we talk about resolving disputes on their merits, we emphasize the importance of examining the facts and evidence presented by both parties involved. For instance, in a workplace disagreement between two employees regarding project responsibilities, it is essential to assess their contributions, roles, and the expectations set forth initially. By focusing on the actual circumstances of the situation, rather than allowing personal feelings or office politics to cloud judgment, a fair outcome can be reached.Moreover, solving the dispute on its merits fosters a culture of accountability and transparency. In legal contexts, judges and arbitrators are often tasked with making decisions based on the merits of each case. This means they must carefully evaluate the arguments, testimonies, and evidence before them, ensuring that their ruling is grounded in factual analysis rather than subjective opinions. Such an approach not only upholds justice but also enhances public trust in the legal system.In addition, resolving conflicts on their merits can lead to more sustainable solutions. When parties understand that the decision was made based on objective criteria, they are more likely to accept the outcome, even if it is not in their favor. This acceptance is crucial for maintaining relationships, whether in personal or professional settings. For example, if two business partners disagree on the direction of their company, a resolution based on the merits of their respective proposals will likely result in a more committed partnership moving forward, as both parties feel heard and respected.On the other hand, failing to resolve disputes on their merits can lead to resentment and further conflict. If a decision is perceived as biased or unfair, it can create a toxic environment where individuals feel undervalued and demotivated. This is particularly evident in workplaces where favoritism may overshadow merit-based evaluations. Therefore, it is vital for leaders and mediators to prioritize an objective assessment of the situation to foster a positive atmosphere.In conclusion, the phrase solve the dispute on its merits encapsulates a fundamental principle of fairness and justice in conflict resolution. By focusing on the facts and evidence rather than external influences, we can achieve outcomes that are equitable and acceptable to all parties involved. This approach not only resolves the immediate issue but also builds a foundation for stronger relationships and trust in the future. Ultimately, embracing this principle can lead to healthier interactions, whether in personal life, business dealings, or legal disputes, creating a more harmonious environment for everyone.

在任何冲突或分歧中，无论是在个人关系、商业还是法律事务中，找到公平和公正的解决方案都是至关重要的。一种有效的方法是根据案件的实质解决争议。这个短语意味着，冲突的解决应基于案件的内在对错，而不是基于情感、偏见或权力动态等外部因素。当我们谈论根据案件的实质来解决争端时，我们强调审查双方提供的事实和证据的重要性。例如，在两名员工之间关于项目责任的工作场所争议中，评估他们的贡献、角色以及最初设定的期望至关重要。通过关注实际情况，而不是让个人情感或办公室政治模糊判断，可以达成公平的结果。此外，根据案件的实质解决争议有助于培养问责制和透明度的文化。在法律背景中，法官和仲裁员通常被要求根据每个案件的实质做出决定。这意味着他们必须仔细评估面前的论点、证词和证据，确保他们的裁决基于事实分析，而不是主观意见。这种方法不仅维护了公正，还增强了公众对法律系统的信任。此外，基于实质解决冲突可以导致更可持续的解决方案。当各方理解这一决定是基于客观标准作出的时，他们更有可能接受结果，即使这不符合他们的利益。这种接受对于维持关系至关重要，无论是在个人还是专业环境中。例如，如果两个商业伙伴在公司发展方向上存在分歧，基于各自提案的实质进行的解决方案将更有可能导致未来更坚定的合作，因为双方都感到被倾听和尊重。另一方面，未能根据案件的实质解决争议可能导致怨恨和进一步的冲突。如果一个决定被视为偏见或不公平，可能会造成一个有毒的环境，让个人感到不被重视和失去动力。这在某些工作场所尤为明显，偏袒可能掩盖基于实质的评估。因此，领导者和调解者优先考虑对情况的客观评估以促进积极氛围是至关重要的。总之，短语根据案件的实质解决争议概括了冲突解决中的公平与正义这一基本原则。通过关注事实和证据而非外部影响，我们可以实现对所有相关方公平且可接受的结果。这种方法不仅解决了眼前的问题，还为未来建立了更强的关系和信任基础。最终，拥抱这一原则可以导致更健康的互动，无论是在个人生活、商业交易还是法律争端中，为每个人创造一个更和谐的环境。