excessive state purchase of farm produce

简明释义

高征购农产品

英英释义

例句

1.To address food security, the policy of excessive state purchase of farm produce was implemented last year.

为了解决食品安全问题，去年实施了过度的国家农产品采购政策。

2.Many farmers are concerned about the excessive state purchase of farm produce leading to dependency on government support.

许多农民担心过度的国家农产品采购会导致对政府支持的依赖。

3.The excessive state purchase of farm produce can create an imbalance in supply and demand, affecting small-scale farmers.

这过度的国家农产品采购可能会造成供需失衡，影响小规模农户。

4.The government has been criticized for its excessive state purchase of farm produce, which some argue distorts market prices.

政府因其过度的国家农产品采购而受到批评，部分人认为这扭曲了市场价格。

5.Critics argue that the excessive state purchase of farm produce undermines the free market.

批评者认为过度的国家农产品采购削弱了自由市场。

作文

The agricultural sector plays a crucial role in the economy of any nation. It not only provides food for the population but also contributes significantly to employment and income generation. However, when the government intervenes excessively in the market, particularly through the excessive state purchase of farm produce, it can lead to various unintended consequences. This practice refers to when the government buys large quantities of agricultural products directly from farmers, often at prices higher than the market rate. While this may seem beneficial in the short term, it can create distortions in the agricultural market and negatively impact both farmers and consumers in the long run.One of the primary reasons governments engage in excessive state purchase of farm produce is to stabilize prices during times of crisis, such as natural disasters or economic downturns. By purchasing surplus produce, the government aims to prevent prices from plummeting, which could financially ruin farmers. However, this intervention can lead to overproduction as farmers may rely on government purchases rather than responding to actual market demand. Consequently, when the government eventually reduces its purchases, farmers may find themselves with unsold produce, leading to significant financial losses.Moreover, excessive state purchase of farm produce can create a dependency on government support among farmers. When farmers know that they can sell their produce to the government at guaranteed prices, they may lack the incentive to innovate or improve their farming practices. This complacency can stifle competition and reduce the overall quality of agricultural products available in the market. Instead of striving for efficiency and quality, farmers might focus solely on meeting the government's purchasing criteria, which can hinder the growth of a dynamic agricultural sector.In addition to affecting farmers, excessive state purchase of farm produce can also have repercussions for consumers. When the government artificially inflates prices by purchasing large quantities of produce, the cost is often passed on to consumers. This means that while farmers may benefit from guaranteed prices, consumers face higher prices for basic food items. In the long run, this can lead to food insecurity, particularly among low-income households who may struggle to afford essential goods.Furthermore, the environmental impact of excessive state purchase of farm produce cannot be overlooked. When farmers are encouraged to produce more to meet government purchasing targets, it can lead to unsustainable farming practices. Overuse of fertilizers, pesticides, and water resources can degrade the environment and diminish soil fertility over time. This not only threatens the future of farming but also poses risks to public health and biodiversity.In conclusion, while the excessive state purchase of farm produce may initially appear to be a safety net for farmers and a tool for stabilizing the agricultural market, it carries with it a range of negative consequences. From creating market distortions and fostering dependency among farmers to increasing consumer prices and harming the environment, the implications of this practice are far-reaching. Therefore, it is essential for governments to strike a balance between supporting farmers and allowing the market to function efficiently. Sustainable agricultural policies should focus on empowering farmers to adapt to market demands rather than relying on excessive state interventions.

农业部门在任何国家的经济中扮演着至关重要的角色。它不仅为人口提供食物，还对就业和收入生成做出重要贡献。然而，当政府在市场中进行过度干预，特别是通过国家过度购买农产品时，可能会导致各种意想不到的后果。这种做法是指政府直接从农民那里以高于市场价格购买大量农产品。虽然这在短期内似乎是有益的，但从长远来看，它可能会在农业市场中造成扭曲，并对农民和消费者产生负面影响。政府进行国家过度购买农产品的主要原因之一是为了在危机时期（如自然灾害或经济衰退）稳定价格。通过购买过剩的农产品，政府旨在防止价格暴跌，这可能会使农民陷入财务困境。然而，这种干预可能导致过度生产，因为农民可能依赖政府采购，而不是响应实际市场需求。因此，当政府最终减少采购时，农民可能会发现自己有未售出的农产品，导致重大财务损失。此外，国家过度购买农产品还可能导致农民对政府支持的依赖。当农民知道他们可以以保证价格将农产品出售给政府时，他们可能缺乏创新或改善耕作方式的动力。这种自满可能会抑制竞争，并降低市场上可用农业产品的整体质量。农民可能专注于满足政府的采购标准，而不是追求效率和质量，这可能会妨碍农业部门的动态增长。除了影响农民外，国家过度购买农产品还可能对消费者产生影响。当政府通过购买大量农产品人为地抬高价格时，成本通常会转嫁给消费者。这意味着虽然农民可能会从保证价格中受益，但消费者面临基本食品价格上涨。从长远来看，这可能导致食品不安全，尤其是在低收入家庭中，他们可能难以负担基本商品。此外，国家过度购买农产品的环境影响也不容忽视。当鼓励农民生产更多以满足政府采购目标时，可能会导致不可持续的耕作实践。过度使用化肥、农药和水资源可能会随着时间的推移破坏环境并降低土壤肥力。这不仅威胁到农业的未来，还对公共健康和生物多样性构成风险。总之，尽管国家过度购买农产品最初看起来是农民的安全网和稳定农业市场的工具，但它带来了许多负面后果。从造成市场扭曲和滋生农民依赖，到提高消费者价格和危害环境，这种做法的影响深远。因此，各国政府必须在支持农民与允许市场有效运作之间取得平衡。可持续的农业政策应专注于赋予农民适应市场需求的能力，而不是依赖过度的国家干预。