demagogic

简明释义

英[ˌdeməˈɡɒɡɪk]美[ˌdeməˈɡɑːɡɪk]

adj. 蛊惑人心的；煽动性的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Mr Cameron's demagogic remarks about burglars hinted at the anxiety. They also point to a fundamental problem with the Tory prospectus.

卡梅隆就窃贼问题煽动性的演说已在暗示托利党的不安了，不仅如此，演说还指到了托利党政策的一个基本问题。

2.Elegant wedding dress skirt is not just by demagogic, Fish Leong chosen in recent years, hot money deep V halter dress.

雅致的婚纱礼服裙不只是蛊惑人心，鱼，热钱深v露背礼服近年来选择丰隆。

3.You have to tear the elderly demagogic network.

你得撕破老年的蛊惑人心的网。

4.Mr Cameron’s demagogic remarks about burglars hinted at the anxiety. They also point to a fundamental problem with the Tory prospectus.

卡梅隆就窃贼问题煽动性的演说已在暗示托利党的不安了，不仅如此，演说还指到了托利党政策的一个基本问题。

5.Mr Cameron's demagogic remarks about burglars hinted at the anxiety. They also point to a fundamental problem with the Tory prospectus.

卡梅隆就窃贼问题煽动性的演说已在暗示托利党的不安了，不仅如此，演说还指到了托利党政策的一个基本问题。

6.The politician's speech was filled with demagogic tactics, appealing to the crowd's emotions rather than reason.

这位政治家的演讲充满了煽动性的手法，诉诸于人群的情感而非理智。

7.Many leaders resort to demagogic rhetoric during times of crisis to gain support.

许多领导人在危机时期诉诸于煽动性的言辞以获得支持。

8.The demagogic approach of the candidate raised concerns about the future of political discourse.

该候选人的煽动性方式引发了对政治话语未来的担忧。

9.His demagogic promises to solve all problems were met with skepticism by the voters.

他对解决所有问题的煽动性承诺遭到了选民的怀疑。

10.Critics argued that the media was giving too much attention to demagogic figures.

批评者认为媒体过于关注煽动性人物。

作文

In today's world, the influence of political leaders and their rhetoric can shape public opinion and societal norms. One term that often arises in discussions about such leaders is demagogic, which refers to a style of political leadership that seeks to gain power by appealing to the emotions, fears, and prejudices of the populace rather than through rational argument or policy. This approach can be particularly dangerous as it often leads to the manipulation of the masses and the erosion of democratic values.Historically, we have seen many examples of demagogic leaders who have risen to power by exploiting societal tensions and divisions. Figures like Adolf Hitler and Joseph McCarthy used demagogic tactics to rally support by invoking fear and scapegoating minority groups. Their ability to connect with the emotional state of their audience allowed them to bypass logical discourse and instead create a narrative that justified their actions, no matter how harmful they were to society at large.In contemporary politics, the rise of social media has amplified the reach of demagogic rhetoric. Politicians can now communicate directly with the public, often bypassing traditional media filters. This direct line allows for the rapid spread of misinformation and emotionally charged messages that resonate with people's fears and desires. For instance, during election campaigns, candidates may resort to demagogic strategies by promising quick fixes to complex problems, knowing that such promises are unlikely to be fulfilled.Moreover, the use of demagogic language can polarize societies. When leaders vilify opponents and frame political issues in black-and-white terms, it can create an environment where compromise becomes impossible. This polarization can lead to increased hostility among citizens and a breakdown of civil discourse. In such an atmosphere, constructive dialogue is replaced by shouting matches, where each side is more interested in winning the argument than in finding common ground.The challenge for voters is to recognize demagogic tactics and hold leaders accountable for their words and actions. It is essential to critically evaluate the claims made by politicians and to seek out well-reasoned arguments rather than succumbing to emotional appeals. Education plays a crucial role in this process; by fostering critical thinking skills and encouraging media literacy, individuals can become more discerning consumers of information.Ultimately, the dangers of demagogic leadership extend beyond individual elections. When leaders prioritize emotional manipulation over genuine leadership, it undermines the very foundations of democracy. Citizens must remain vigilant and engaged, ensuring that their leaders are held to a higher standard—one that values truth, accountability, and the well-being of all members of society. By doing so, we can work towards a political landscape that is less susceptible to the allure of demagogic rhetoric and more focused on collaborative problem-solving and mutual respect.

在当今世界，政治领导者及其修辞的影响可以塑造公众舆论和社会规范。一个常常在关于这些领导者的讨论中出现的术语是煽动性的，它指的是一种政治领导风格，通过诉诸民众的情感、恐惧和偏见来获取权力，而不是通过理性论证或政策。这种方法可能尤其危险，因为它通常导致对大众的操控以及民主价值的侵蚀。历史上，我们看到许多例子，其中煽动性领导者通过利用社会紧张局势和分裂而崛起。像阿道夫·希特勒和约瑟夫·麦卡锡这样的角色使用煽动性策略，通过引发恐惧和替罪羊少数群体来聚集支持。他们能够与听众的情感状态相连接，使他们能够绕过逻辑讨论，创造出一个合理化其行为的叙述，无论这些行为对社会整体有多么有害。在当代政治中，社交媒体的崛起放大了煽动性修辞的影响。政治家现在可以直接与公众沟通，通常绕过传统媒体的过滤。这条直接的线路使得错误信息和情感充沛的信息迅速传播，触动人们的恐惧和欲望。例如，在选举活动中，候选人可能会诉诸煽动性策略，承诺对复杂问题的快速解决，明知这些承诺不太可能实现。此外，使用煽动性语言可能会使社会极化。当领导者诋毁对手，并将政治问题框定为非黑即白时，这可能会造成妥协变得不可能的环境。这种极化可能导致公民之间的敌对加剧以及公民话语的破裂。在这样的氛围中，建设性的对话被争吵所取代，每一方都更关心赢得辩论，而不是找到共同点。选民面临的挑战是识别煽动性策略，并让领导者对他们的言行负责。至关重要的是要批判性地评估政治家所做的声明，并寻求经过深思熟虑的论点，而不是屈从于情感的呼唤。教育在这个过程中发挥着至关重要的作用；通过培养批判性思维能力和鼓励媒体素养，个人可以成为信息的更明智消费者。最终，煽动性领导的危险超越了单个选举。当领导者优先考虑情感操控而不是真正的领导时，它削弱了民主的基础。公民必须保持警惕和参与，确保他们的领导者受到更高标准的约束——这一标准重视真相、问责制和所有社会成员的福祉。通过这样做，我们可以朝着一个不那么容易受到煽动性修辞吸引的政治格局努力，更多地关注合作解决问题和相互尊重。