budget dirigism

简明释义

干预经济的预算政策

英英释义

例句

1.In times of crisis, budget dirigism can be a useful tool for governments to stimulate growth.

在危机时期，预算干预主义可以成为政府刺激增长的有用工具。

2.The government's approach to economic recovery heavily relies on budget dirigism, which means they are directing funds to specific sectors.

政府的经济复苏方法严重依赖于预算干预主义，这意味着他们将资金引导到特定部门。

3.The new policy introduced by the administration is an example of budget dirigism aimed at boosting renewable energy investments.

政府推出的新政策是一个旨在促进可再生能源投资的预算干预主义的例子。

4.Supporters of budget dirigism believe it can help achieve social equity by prioritizing funding for disadvantaged communities.

支持预算干预主义的人认为，它可以通过优先为弱势群体提供资金来实现社会公平。

5.Critics argue that budget dirigism can lead to inefficiencies in resource allocation.

批评者认为预算干预主义可能导致资源配置的低效。

作文

In recent years, the term budget dirigism has gained traction among economists and policymakers as a means to describe a specific approach to fiscal policy. This concept refers to a system where the government plays a central role in directing economic activity through its budgetary decisions. In essence, budget dirigism emphasizes the importance of state intervention in the economy, particularly in times of crisis or economic downturns. The idea is that by carefully allocating resources and funding specific sectors, the government can stimulate growth and ensure stability. Historically, many countries have employed variations of budget dirigism to navigate economic challenges. For example, during the Great Depression, governments worldwide implemented extensive public works programs funded through government budgets to create jobs and boost demand. Similarly, in the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, many nations adopted stimulus packages that reflected the principles of budget dirigism. These measures were designed to inject liquidity into the economy and support struggling industries. The effectiveness of budget dirigism often sparks debate among economists. Proponents argue that it allows for targeted interventions that can lead to significant improvements in economic performance. By focusing on critical areas such as infrastructure, education, and healthcare, governments can create a more resilient economy. This approach also enables governments to address social inequalities by redistributing resources to those in need, thereby fostering a more inclusive society. On the other hand, critics of budget dirigism contend that excessive government intervention can lead to inefficiencies and distortions in the market. They argue that when the government takes control of resource allocation, it may stifle innovation and competition, which are essential for long-term economic growth. Furthermore, there are concerns about the sustainability of such an approach, particularly if it leads to increased public debt. Critics warn that relying too heavily on government spending can create a dependency that may hinder private sector development. In light of these debates, it is essential to strike a balance between the benefits and drawbacks of budget dirigism. A hybrid approach that combines targeted government interventions with market-driven solutions may offer a more effective strategy for managing economic challenges. For instance, while the government can invest in critical infrastructure projects, it should also encourage private investment and entrepreneurship to stimulate economic growth. In conclusion, budget dirigism represents a significant approach to fiscal policy that highlights the role of government in shaping economic outcomes. As economies continue to face various challenges, understanding the implications of this concept becomes increasingly important. Policymakers must carefully consider the potential advantages and disadvantages of budget dirigism to formulate strategies that promote sustainable growth while addressing pressing social needs. Ultimately, the goal should be to create an economic environment where both the government and the private sector can thrive together, ensuring a stable and prosperous future for all citizens.

近年来，术语预算指导主义在经济学家和政策制定者中越来越受到关注，用来描述一种特定的财政政策方法。这个概念指的是政府在其预算决策中发挥核心作用，通过预算来引导经济活动。实质上，预算指导主义强调国家干预经济的重要性，尤其是在危机或经济衰退时期。这个想法是，通过精心分配资源和资金特定部门，政府可以刺激增长并确保稳定。历史上，许多国家在应对经济挑战时采用了不同形式的预算指导主义。例如，在大萧条期间，全球各国实施了广泛的公共工程项目，这些项目通过政府预算资助，以创造就业机会并促进需求。同样，在2008年金融危机后，许多国家采取了反映预算指导主义原则的刺激方案。这些措施旨在向经济注入流动性，并支持陷入困境的行业。预算指导主义的有效性常常引发经济学家的辩论。支持者认为，它允许针对性的干预，可以显著改善经济表现。通过关注基础设施、教育和医疗等关键领域，政府可以创造一个更具韧性的经济。这种方法还使政府能够通过向需要帮助的人重新分配资源来解决社会不平等，从而促进一个更加包容的社会。另一方面，预算指导主义的批评者认为，过度的政府干预可能导致市场中的低效率和扭曲。他们认为，当政府控制资源配置时，可能会抑制创新和竞争，而这些对于长期经济增长至关重要。此外，人们对这种方法的可持续性表示担忧，特别是如果它导致公共债务增加。批评者警告说，过于依赖政府支出可能会造成一种依赖性，从而妨碍私营部门的发展。鉴于这些辩论，找到预算指导主义的优缺点之间的平衡至关重要。一种结合了针对性政府干预与市场驱动解决方案的混合方法，可能为管理经济挑战提供更有效的策略。例如，虽然政府可以投资于关键基础设施项目，但也应鼓励私人投资和创业，以刺激经济增长。总之，预算指导主义代表了一种重要的财政政策方法，突出了政府在塑造经济结果中的作用。随着经济继续面临各种挑战，理解这一概念的含义变得越来越重要。政策制定者必须仔细考虑预算指导主义的潜在优点和缺点，以制定促进可持续增长的策略，同时满足紧迫的社会需求。最终，目标应该是创造一个政府和私营部门共同繁荣的经济环境，确保所有公民的稳定和繁荣的未来。