adhesion contract

简明释义

附从合同,附从契约,附合合同,附意合同

英英释义

例句

1.When you sign up for a mobile phone plan, you often agree to an adhesion contract 附合合同 that outlines the terms set by the provider.

当你注册手机计划时，你通常会同意一个adhesion contract 附合合同，其中列出了提供商设定的条款。

2.Consumers should read the fine print in an adhesion contract 附合合同 to understand any hidden fees.

消费者应该仔细阅读adhesion contract 附合合同中的细则，以了解任何隐藏费用。

3.The terms of the adhesion contract 附合合同 are non-negotiable, meaning you must accept them as they are.

这个adhesion contract 附合合同的条款是不可谈判的，这意味着你必须按原样接受它们。

4.Many online services require users to accept an adhesion contract 附合合同 before accessing their platforms.

许多在线服务要求用户在访问其平台之前接受一个adhesion contract 附合合同。

5.A lease agreement is often an example of an adhesion contract 附合合同 where one party has significantly more power than the other.

租赁协议通常是一个adhesion contract 附合合同的例子，其中一方的权力显著超过另一方。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, consumers often find themselves entering into various agreements without fully understanding the terms and conditions. One significant type of agreement that has gained attention in recent years is the adhesion contract. An adhesion contract is a standardized agreement created by one party, typically a business or organization, and presented to the other party on a take-it-or-leave-it basis. This means that the consumer has little to no ability to negotiate the terms of the contract, as it is designed to be accepted as is. The rise of technology and online services has led to an increase in the use of adhesion contracts. For instance, when signing up for a new app or service, users are often required to accept lengthy terms and conditions that they may not read thoroughly. These contracts are often filled with legal jargon and complex language, making it difficult for the average consumer to grasp their rights and obligations. This lack of understanding can lead to unintended consequences, as individuals may unknowingly agree to unfavorable terms.One of the primary concerns surrounding adhesion contracts is the imbalance of power between the parties involved. The entity drafting the contract typically holds significantly more power than the consumer, who is left with little choice but to accept the terms if they wish to use the service or product. This power disparity raises ethical questions about fairness and transparency in contractual agreements. Critics argue that such practices can lead to exploitation of consumers, particularly those who may not have the resources or knowledge to challenge unfair terms.Moreover, adhesion contracts can sometimes contain clauses that limit liability or require arbitration in the event of a dispute. These provisions can further disadvantage consumers, as they may be forced to resolve conflicts in a manner that is less favorable than traditional litigation. For example, a company might include a clause that prevents customers from joining class-action lawsuits, which can effectively silence individual complaints against corporate wrongdoing.Despite these concerns, adhesion contracts are often legally enforceable, provided that they do not contain unconscionable terms. Courts generally uphold these agreements as long as they are clear and conspicuous, meaning that the terms must be presented in a way that is easy for the consumer to understand. However, this does not alleviate the responsibility of businesses to ensure that their contracts are fair and transparent.To navigate the complexities of adhesion contracts, consumers should take proactive steps to educate themselves about their rights. Before agreeing to any contract, it is advisable to read the terms thoroughly, even if they seem lengthy and tedious. Additionally, seeking legal advice or consulting consumer protection agencies can provide valuable insights into potential pitfalls associated with these agreements.In conclusion, while adhesion contracts play a crucial role in facilitating transactions in our modern economy, they also pose significant challenges for consumers. Understanding the nature of these agreements and the implications they carry is essential for protecting oneself in a landscape where informed consent is often overshadowed by convenience. Awareness and education are key components in empowering consumers to make informed decisions and advocate for fairer contractual practices.

在当今快节奏的世界中，消费者常常发现自己在没有充分理解条款和条件的情况下签署各种协议。一种近年来备受关注的重要协议类型是附随合同。附随合同是一种由一方（通常是企业或组织）创建的标准化协议，并以“接受或放弃”的方式呈现给另一方。这意味着消费者几乎没有能力对合同条款进行谈判，因为它被设计成必须原封不动地接受。技术和在线服务的兴起导致了附随合同使用的增加。例如，当注册一个新应用程序或服务时，用户通常需要接受冗长的条款和条件，而他们可能不会仔细阅读。这些合同通常充满法律术语和复杂的语言，使普通消费者很难理解自己的权利和义务。这种缺乏理解可能导致意想不到的后果，因为个人可能在不知情的情况下同意不利的条款。围绕附随合同的主要担忧之一是参与各方之间的权力失衡。起草合同的一方通常比消费者拥有显著更多的权力，而消费者在希望使用服务或产品时几乎别无选择，只能接受这些条款。这种权力差异引发了有关合同协议中公平性和透明性的伦理问题。批评者认为，这种做法可能导致对消费者的剥削，特别是那些可能没有资源或知识来挑战不公平条款的人。此外，附随合同有时可能包含限制责任或在争议发生时要求仲裁的条款。这些条款可能进一步使消费者处于不利地位，因为他们可能被迫以不如传统诉讼更有利的方式解决冲突。例如，一家公司可能会包含一项条款，禁止客户参加集体诉讼，这实际上可能使个人投诉公司不当行为的声音沉默。尽管存在这些担忧，附随合同通常是法律上可强制执行的，只要它们不包含不合理的条款。法院一般会支持这些协议，只要它们清晰且显而易见，这意味着条款必须以易于消费者理解的方式呈现。然而，这并不能减轻企业确保其合同公平和透明的责任。为了应对附随合同的复杂性，消费者应采取主动措施来提高自身的权利意识。在同意任何合同之前，建议彻底阅读条款，即使它们看起来冗长且乏味。此外，寻求法律建议或咨询消费者保护机构可以为潜在的陷阱提供宝贵的见解。总之，虽然附随合同在促进现代经济交易中发挥着至关重要的作用，但它们也给消费者带来了重大挑战。理解这些协议的性质及其所带来的影响对于保护自己在一个知情同意常常被便利性掩盖的环境中至关重要。意识和教育是赋予消费者做出明智决策和倡导更公平合同实践的关键组成部分。