monetary measures of welfare

简明释义

福利的货币度量

英英释义

例句

1.The city council approved a budget for monetary measures of welfare aimed at improving community health.

市议会批准了一项预算，用于旨在改善社区健康的福利的货币措施。

2.The report highlighted the need for better monetary measures of welfare to address social inequality.

报告强调了需要更好的福利的货币措施来解决社会不平等问题。

3.Many economists argue that monetary measures of welfare should be linked to employment rates.

许多经济学家认为，福利的货币措施应该与就业率挂钩。

4.Researchers are studying the effectiveness of monetary measures of welfare in reducing poverty rates.

研究人员正在研究福利的货币措施在降低贫困率方面的有效性。

5.The government implemented new monetary measures of welfare to support low-income families during the economic downturn.

政府实施了新的福利的货币措施，以支持经济衰退期间的低收入家庭。

作文

The concept of welfare has evolved significantly over the years, and it encompasses various dimensions of human well-being. One important aspect of this is the use of monetary measures of welfare, which refers to the financial indicators and metrics used to assess the quality of life and economic well-being of individuals and communities. These measures often include income levels, consumption patterns, and access to essential services, providing a quantitative basis for evaluating welfare. In many societies, the effectiveness of government policies aimed at improving welfare can be assessed through these monetary measures of welfare. For instance, when a government implements social programs, such as unemployment benefits or food assistance, the impact of these initiatives can be measured by examining changes in household income and spending. If these programs lead to an increase in disposable income for families, it is likely that their overall welfare has improved.However, relying solely on monetary measures of welfare has its limitations. While income and consumption are critical indicators, they do not capture the full spectrum of human experiences. Factors such as mental health, social cohesion, and environmental quality are equally important in determining overall welfare. For example, a community may have high average incomes, but if people suffer from high levels of stress, anxiety, or lack of social support, their welfare may still be low. Thus, it is essential to complement monetary measures with qualitative assessments that consider these broader aspects of well-being.Furthermore, the distribution of wealth within a society plays a crucial role in understanding welfare. High average income levels can mask significant inequalities that exist beneath the surface. This is where tools like the Gini coefficient come into play, providing a more nuanced view of how income is distributed across different segments of the population. By analyzing these disparities, policymakers can better target interventions to improve welfare for marginalized groups who may not benefit from general economic growth.Additionally, the context in which monetary measures of welfare are applied is vital. Different countries and regions may have varying standards of living and cultural expectations, which can influence how welfare is perceived and measured. For example, in some cultures, community and familial ties may be prioritized over individual financial success. Therefore, any analysis of welfare must take into account these cultural dimensions to create effective policies.In conclusion, while monetary measures of welfare provide valuable insights into the economic aspects of well-being, they should not be viewed in isolation. A comprehensive approach that integrates both quantitative and qualitative data is necessary to gain a holistic understanding of welfare. Policymakers must strive to create frameworks that not only enhance economic indicators but also address the social and environmental factors that contribute to a fulfilling and prosperous life. Only then can we hope to achieve true welfare for all members of society.

福利的概念在多年来发生了显著变化，它涵盖了人类福祉的各个维度。其中一个重要方面是使用货币福利措施，指的是用于评估个人和社区生活质量及经济福祉的财务指标和度量。这些措施通常包括收入水平、消费模式和对基本服务的获取，为评估福利提供了定量基础。在许多社会中，政府旨在改善福利的政策的有效性可以通过这些货币福利措施进行评估。例如，当政府实施社会项目，如失业救济或食品援助时，这些举措的影响可以通过检查家庭收入和支出变化来衡量。如果这些项目导致家庭可支配收入的增加，那么他们的整体福利可能已经得到改善。然而，仅仅依赖于货币福利措施是有其局限性的。虽然收入和消费是关键指标，但它们并不能捕捉到人类经验的全貌。心理健康、社会凝聚力和环境质量等因素在决定整体福利方面同样重要。例如，一个社区的平均收入可能很高，但如果人们面临着高水平的压力、焦虑或缺乏社会支持，他们的福利仍然可能很低。因此，补充货币措施与考虑这些更广泛的福祉方面的定性评估是至关重要的。此外，社会内部财富的分配在理解福利方面也发挥着至关重要的作用。高平均收入水平可能掩盖了表面下存在的重大不平等。这就是基尼系数等工具发挥作用的地方，它提供了关于收入如何在不同人口群体之间分配的更细致的视角。通过分析这些差距，政策制定者可以更好地针对干预措施，以改善边缘群体的福利，他们可能无法从一般经济增长中受益。此外，货币福利措施应用的背景也是至关重要的。不同国家和地区可能有不同的生活标准和文化期望，这可能影响福利的感知和测量。例如，在一些文化中，社区和家庭关系可能被优先考虑，而不是个人经济成功。因此，任何福利分析都必须考虑这些文化维度，以制定有效的政策。总之，虽然货币福利措施为经济福祉的各个方面提供了有价值的见解，但不应孤立地看待它们。综合定量和定性数据的方法是获得全面理解福利的必要条件。政策制定者必须努力创建不仅增强经济指标而且解决有助于充实和繁荣生活的社会和环境因素的框架。只有这样，我们才能希望实现社会所有成员的真正福利。