official minimum rate

简明释义

法定最低利率,法定最低汇率

英英释义

例句

1.The official minimum rate 官方最低工资标准 is intended to protect low-income workers from exploitation.

官方最低工资标准旨在保护低收入工人免受剥削。

2.Local businesses are concerned about how the new official minimum rate 官方最低工资标准 will affect their operations.

当地企业担心新的官方最低工资标准将如何影响他们的运营。

3.The government announced that the official minimum rate 官方最低工资标准 will be increased next year.

政府宣布明年将提高官方最低工资标准。

4.Many workers are struggling to make ends meet, even with the official minimum rate 官方最低工资标准 in place.

即使有官方最低工资标准，许多工人仍然难以维持生计。

5.Employers must comply with the official minimum rate 官方最低工资标准 set by the labor department.

雇主必须遵守劳动部门设定的官方最低工资标准。

作文

In many countries, the concept of a minimum wage is crucial to ensuring that workers are compensated fairly for their labor. The official minimum rate refers to the legally mandated lowest salary that employers are required to pay their employees. This rate is designed to protect workers from exploitation and to ensure that they can meet their basic needs. The establishment of an official minimum rate is often a contentious issue, as it involves balancing the needs of workers with the economic realities faced by employers.The official minimum rate varies significantly from country to country and even within regions of the same country. For instance, in the United States, each state has the authority to set its own minimum wage, which can lead to disparities in income levels across different areas. Some states have adopted a higher official minimum rate than the federal minimum wage, reflecting the higher cost of living in those regions. Conversely, other states may choose to maintain a lower rate, which can have significant implications for their workforce.One of the primary arguments in favor of an official minimum rate is that it helps reduce poverty and inequality. By guaranteeing a baseline income, workers are better equipped to afford necessities such as housing, food, and healthcare. This, in turn, can lead to a healthier and more productive workforce. Moreover, when workers have more disposable income, they are likely to spend it on goods and services, which can stimulate local economies.However, critics of the official minimum rate often argue that raising the minimum wage can lead to unintended consequences, such as increased unemployment. They contend that if employers are required to pay higher wages, they may be forced to reduce their workforce or cut back on hiring altogether. Additionally, some small businesses may struggle to absorb the costs associated with a higher minimum wage, potentially leading to closures or reduced hours for employees.The debate over the official minimum rate is further complicated by the impact of inflation. As the cost of living rises, the purchasing power of the minimum wage can diminish, leading advocates to call for regular adjustments to the official minimum rate. This ensures that the wage remains relevant and continues to provide adequate support for workers.In recent years, there has been a growing movement advocating for a living wage, which is often higher than the official minimum rate. A living wage is intended to reflect the actual cost of living in a given area, taking into account factors such as housing, food, transportation, and healthcare. Proponents argue that simply having a minimum wage is not enough; it must be sufficient to allow workers to live with dignity and security.In conclusion, the official minimum rate plays a vital role in shaping labor markets and influencing the lives of millions of workers. While it serves as a critical tool for ensuring fair compensation, it also raises complex questions about economic viability and social equity. As societies continue to evolve, the conversation surrounding the official minimum rate will remain a central topic in discussions about work, income, and justice. It is essential for policymakers to carefully consider the implications of setting and adjusting this rate, striving to find a balance that supports both workers and employers alike.

在许多国家，最低工资的概念对于确保工人公平地获得劳动报酬至关重要。官方最低工资标准是指法律规定的雇主必须支付给员工的最低工资。这一标准旨在保护工人免受剥削，并确保他们能够满足基本生活需求。设定官方最低工资标准通常是一个有争议的问题，因为这涉及到平衡工人的需求与雇主面临的经济现实。官方最低工资标准在不同国家之间以及同一国家的不同地区之间差异显著。例如，在美国，每个州都有权设定自己的最低工资，这可能导致不同地区收入水平的不平等。一些州的官方最低工资标准高于联邦最低工资，反映了这些地区更高的生活成本。相反，其他一些州可能选择维持较低的标准，这对其劳动力可能产生重大影响。支持设定官方最低工资标准的主要论点之一是，它有助于减少贫困和不平等。通过保证一个基本收入，工人能够更好地负担住房、食品和医疗等必要开支。这反过来又可以导致更健康、更高效的劳动力。此外，当工人拥有更多可支配收入时，他们更可能将这些收入用于购买商品和服务，从而刺激地方经济。然而，官方最低工资标准的批评者常常认为，提高最低工资可能会导致意想不到的后果，例如失业率上升。他们辩称，如果雇主被要求支付更高的工资，他们可能不得不减少员工人数或减少招聘。此外，一些小企业可能难以吸收与提高最低工资相关的成本，这可能导致企业倒闭或员工工作时间减少。关于官方最低工资标准的辩论因通货膨胀的影响而变得更加复杂。随着生活成本的上升，最低工资的购买力可能会下降，这使得倡导者呼吁定期调整官方最低工资标准。这确保了工资保持相关性，并继续为工人提供足够的支持。近年来，越来越多的人提倡生活工资，这通常高于官方最低工资标准。生活工资旨在反映特定地区的实际生活成本，考虑住房、食品、交通和医疗等因素。倡导者认为，仅仅拥有最低工资是不够的；它必须足以让工人有尊严和安全地生活。总之，官方最低工资标准在塑造劳动力市场和影响数百万工人的生活方面发挥着至关重要的作用。虽然它作为确保公平补偿的重要工具，但它也引发了有关经济可行性和社会公平的复杂问题。随着社会的不断发展，围绕官方最低工资标准的讨论将继续成为关于工作、收入和正义的重要话题。政策制定者必须仔细考虑设定和调整这一标准的影响，努力找到支持工人和雇主之间的平衡。