make a monopoly of; exclusive dealing

简明释义

独家经营

英英释义

例句

1.The company aims to make a monopoly of the smartphone market by acquiring its competitors.

该公司旨在通过收购竞争对手来垄断智能手机市场。

2.The government is concerned about exclusive dealing practices that harm small businesses.

政府对损害小企业的独占交易行为表示担忧。

3.If they continue to make a monopoly of online retail, smaller shops may go out of business.

如果他们继续垄断在线零售，较小的商店可能会倒闭。

4.By establishing strong brand loyalty, the firm hopes to make a monopoly of the luxury car segment.

通过建立强大的品牌忠诚度，该公司希望在豪华汽车领域垄断市场。

5.Exclusive contracts can lead to exclusive dealing, limiting choices for consumers.

独家合同可能导致独占交易，限制消费者的选择。

作文

In today's global economy, the concept of competition is often overshadowed by the emergence of large corporations that strive to dominate their respective markets. One of the most significant strategies employed by these corporations is to make a monopoly of; exclusive dealing. This practice involves controlling a market segment to the extent that competitors are either severely limited or completely eliminated from participating in that space. In essence, it means that a single company holds the power to dictate terms, prices, and availability of products or services within a particular market.

To understand how make a monopoly of; exclusive dealing works, we can look at various industries where this phenomenon is prevalent. For instance, in the tech industry, companies like Apple and Google have been accused of engaging in practices that create monopolistic conditions. By establishing exclusive contracts with app developers or suppliers, they effectively limit the options available to consumers and other businesses. This not only stifles competition but also leads to higher prices and fewer choices for consumers.

The implications of make a monopoly of; exclusive dealing extend beyond just economic factors. When a single entity dominates a market, it can influence public policy and regulations to favor its interests. This creates a cycle where the monopolistic company becomes more powerful, while smaller businesses struggle to survive. As a result, innovation may suffer, as new entrants to the market find it increasingly difficult to compete against established giants.

Moreover, make a monopoly of; exclusive dealing can have social consequences as well. With fewer players in the market, job opportunities may decrease, leading to higher unemployment rates in affected sectors. Additionally, consumer trust can erode, as people become aware that their choices are being manipulated by a few powerful corporations. This can lead to a backlash against these companies, resulting in calls for stricter regulations and oversight.

To combat the negative effects of make a monopoly of; exclusive dealing, governments and regulatory bodies must take proactive measures. Antitrust laws play a crucial role in ensuring fair competition and preventing monopolistic practices. These laws are designed to promote a level playing field where companies can compete based on merit rather than size or influence. By enforcing these regulations, authorities can help maintain a diverse marketplace that benefits consumers and fosters innovation.

In conclusion, while the strategy to make a monopoly of; exclusive dealing can yield short-term gains for corporations, the long-term consequences can be detrimental to the economy and society as a whole. It is essential for both consumers and regulators to remain vigilant against such practices, advocating for fairness and competition in all markets. Only through collective efforts can we ensure a healthy and vibrant economic environment that encourages growth, innovation, and equality for all stakeholders.

在当今全球经济中，竞争的概念常常被大型企业的出现所掩盖，这些企业努力主导各自的市场。其中一个重要的策略就是垄断；独占交易。这种做法涉及控制一个市场细分领域，以至于竞争者要么受到严重限制，要么完全被排除在该领域之外。实质上，这意味着单一公司拥有支配特定市场内产品或服务的条款、价格和可用性的权力。

为了理解垄断；独占交易是如何运作的，我们可以看看这一现象盛行的各个行业。例如，在科技行业，像苹果和谷歌这样的公司被指控采取了创造垄断条件的做法。通过与应用程序开发者或供应商建立独占合同，它们有效地限制了消费者和其他企业的选择。这不仅扼杀了竞争，还导致了消费者面临更高的价格和更少的选择。

垄断；独占交易的影响不仅限于经济因素。当一个实体主导市场时，它可以影响公共政策和法规，以支持其利益。这造成了一个循环，垄断公司变得更加强大，而小型企业则难以生存。因此，创新可能会受到影响，因为新进入市场的公司发现越来越难以与已有巨头竞争。

此外，垄断；独占交易也可能产生社会后果。市场参与者减少，可能导致就业机会的减少，从而使受影响行业的失业率上升。此外，消费者信任可能会下降，因为人们意识到他们的选择正被少数强大的公司操控。这可能导致对这些公司的反弹，进而引发对更严格的监管和监督的呼声。

为了应对垄断；独占交易的负面影响，政府和监管机构必须采取主动措施。反垄断法在确保公平竞争和防止垄断行为方面发挥着至关重要的作用。这些法律旨在促进一个公平的竞争环境，使公司能够基于优点而非规模或影响力进行竞争。通过执行这些法规，当局可以帮助维护一个多样化的市场，使消费者受益并促进创新。

总之，尽管采取垄断；独占交易的策略可能为公司带来短期收益，但长期后果可能对经济和社会整体产生不利影响。消费者和监管机构必须保持警惕，抵制此类行为，倡导所有市场中的公平和竞争。只有通过集体努力，我们才能确保一个健康和充满活力的经济环境，鼓励所有利益相关者的增长、创新和公平。