adhesion contract

简明释义

定式合同

英英释义

例句

1.When you sign up for a new mobile phone plan, you often enter into an adhesion contract 附合合同 that has terms set by the provider.

当你注册新的手机套餐时，你通常会签署一个由提供商设定条款的adhesion contract 附合合同。

2.Many online services require users to agree to an adhesion contract 附合合同 before accessing their features.

许多在线服务要求用户在访问其功能之前同意一个adhesion contract 附合合同。

3.A common example of an adhesion contract 附合合同 is the agreement you accept when installing software.

一个常见的adhesion contract 附合合同 例子是你在安装软件时接受的协议。

4.In many cases, individuals do not fully understand the implications of signing an adhesion contract 附合合同.

在许多情况下，个人并未完全理解签署adhesion contract 附合合同 的影响。

5.The terms of the adhesion contract 附合合同 were heavily biased in favor of the company, leaving consumers with little choice.

这个adhesion contract 附合合同 的条款严重偏向于公司，使消费者几乎没有选择余地。

作文

In the realm of contract law, the concept of an adhesion contract is crucial for understanding the dynamics of agreements formed between parties with unequal bargaining power. An adhesion contract refers to a standard form contract that is drafted by one party (usually the stronger party) and presented to the other party (the weaker party) on a 'take it or leave it' basis. This means that the weaker party has little to no ability to negotiate the terms of the contract. Such contracts are commonly found in consumer transactions, such as insurance policies, lease agreements, and service contracts.The primary characteristic of an adhesion contract is its unilateral nature, where one party dictates the terms, leaving the other party with limited options. For example, when purchasing a mobile phone, consumers often encounter contracts that outline the terms of service provided by the network carrier. These contracts are usually lengthy documents filled with legal jargon that the average consumer may not fully understand. The consumer's choice is often limited to either accepting the terms as they are or foregoing the purchase altogether.One of the main concerns regarding adhesion contracts is the potential for unfairness. Since the stronger party typically has more resources and negotiating power, they can impose terms that heavily favor themselves at the expense of the weaker party. Courts have recognized this imbalance and have sometimes intervened to protect consumers from overly harsh terms in adhesion contracts. For instance, certain clauses may be deemed unconscionable if they are excessively one-sided or if they exploit the lack of understanding of the weaker party.Moreover, the enforceability of adhesion contracts can come into question when they contain ambiguous or misleading language. If a consumer is misled about the terms of the contract, they may argue that they did not truly consent to the agreement. In such cases, courts may refuse to enforce the contract based on the principle of fair dealing.Despite these concerns, adhesion contracts are widely used because they provide efficiency and convenience in transactions. They allow businesses to streamline their operations by using standardized agreements that can be quickly executed without extensive negotiations. This is particularly beneficial in industries where time is of the essence, such as telecommunications and utilities.In conclusion, while adhesion contracts serve an important role in facilitating transactions, it is essential for consumers to be aware of their rights and the implications of entering into such agreements. Understanding the nature of adhesion contracts can empower consumers to make informed decisions and advocate for fairer terms in their dealings. As the landscape of consumer protection continues to evolve, the scrutiny of adhesion contracts will likely remain a significant area of focus for both legal practitioners and policymakers alike.

在合同法领域，附随合同的概念对于理解双方之间不平等谈判权力的协议动态至关重要。附随合同指的是由一方（通常是强势方）起草的标准格式合同，并以“接受或放弃”的方式呈现给另一方（弱势方）。这意味着弱势方几乎没有能力对合同条款进行谈判。这种合同通常出现在消费者交易中，例如保险单、租赁协议和服务合同。附随合同的主要特征是其单方面性质，一方规定条款，另一方几乎没有选择。例如，在购买手机时，消费者经常会遇到规定网络运营商提供的服务条款的合同。这些合同通常是冗长的文件，充满了普通消费者可能无法完全理解的法律术语。消费者的选择往往仅限于接受条款，或者放弃购买。关于附随合同的主要担忧是潜在的不公平性。由于强势方通常拥有更多的资源和谈判权力，他们可以施加有利于自己的条款，而牺牲弱势方的利益。法院已经认识到这种不平衡，并有时会干预以保护消费者免受过于苛刻的附随合同条款的影响。例如，如果某些条款过于偏袒一方，或者如果它们利用了弱势方的缺乏理解，可能会被视为不合理。此外，当附随合同包含模糊或误导性语言时，其可执行性可能会受到质疑。如果消费者对合同条款感到误导，他们可能会辩称自己并未真正同意该协议。在这种情况下，法院可能会基于公平交易原则拒绝执行该合同。尽管存在这些担忧，附随合同因其在交易中提供效率和便利而被广泛使用。它们使企业能够通过使用标准化协议来简化操作，这些协议可以快速执行而无需广泛的谈判。这在时间至关重要的行业中尤其有益，例如电信和公用事业。总之，虽然附随合同在促进交易中发挥着重要作用，但消费者了解自己的权利以及签订此类协议的含义至关重要。理解附随合同的性质可以使消费者能够做出明智的决定，并为更公平的交易条款进行辩护。随着消费者保护领域的不断发展，对附随合同的审查可能仍将是法律从业者和政策制定者关注的重要领域。