setting quotas for subsidies

简明释义

定额补贴

英英释义

例句

1.The new policy involves setting quotas for subsidies that will benefit small businesses.

新政策涉及设定补贴配额，将惠及小型企业。

2.The government is considering setting quotas for subsidies to promote renewable energy sources.

政府正在考虑设定补贴配额以促进可再生能源的使用。

3.The committee is responsible for setting quotas for subsidies in the agricultural sector.

委员会负责在农业部门内设定补贴配额。

4.By setting quotas for subsidies, the agency aims to ensure fair distribution of funds among farmers.

通过设定补贴配额，该机构旨在确保资金在农民之间的公平分配。

5.Experts suggest that setting quotas for subsidies can help reduce waste in government spending.

专家建议，设定补贴配额可以帮助减少政府支出的浪费。

作文

In recent years, the concept of government intervention in the economy has gained significant attention. One of the most debated topics within this realm is the practice of setting quotas for subsidies, which refers to the process by which governments allocate a specific amount of financial aid or support to particular sectors or industries. These subsidies can take many forms, including direct cash payments, tax breaks, or reduced prices for goods and services. The intent behind setting quotas for subsidies is often to promote economic growth, protect local industries, or address social issues such as poverty and unemployment.The rationale for setting quotas for subsidies stems from the belief that certain industries may need additional support to compete effectively in the market. For example, renewable energy sectors often receive subsidies to encourage the transition from fossil fuels to cleaner energy sources. By setting quotas for subsidies, governments aim to stimulate investment in these industries, create jobs, and ultimately contribute to a more sustainable economy.However, the implementation of setting quotas for subsidies is not without its challenges. Critics argue that it can lead to market distortions, where resources are allocated inefficiently. When governments favor certain industries over others, it can create an uneven playing field, leading to a lack of competition and innovation. Additionally, there is the risk of dependency, where industries become reliant on government support rather than striving for efficiency and self-sufficiency.Moreover, the process of setting quotas for subsidies can be influenced by political factors, which may not always align with economic rationality. Lobbying by powerful interest groups can result in subsidies being directed towards industries that may not necessarily warrant support based on their economic viability. This can lead to a misallocation of public funds, diverting resources away from more productive uses.Despite these concerns, setting quotas for subsidies can also have positive outcomes when implemented judiciously. For instance, during economic downturns, targeted subsidies can help stabilize key sectors and prevent widespread job losses. In such cases, setting quotas for subsidies can act as a safety net, providing essential support to businesses and workers alike.In conclusion, the practice of setting quotas for subsidies represents a complex interplay between government policy and market dynamics. While it can serve as a tool for promoting economic growth and stability, it also poses risks that must be carefully managed. Policymakers need to strike a balance between providing necessary support to vulnerable industries while ensuring that the overall market remains competitive and efficient. Ultimately, the effectiveness of setting quotas for subsidies hinges on thoughtful implementation and ongoing evaluation to ensure that it meets its intended goals without causing unintended consequences.

近年来，政府干预经济的概念引起了广泛关注。在这一领域中，最具争议的话题之一是实施设定补贴配额的做法，即政府为特定部门或行业分配一定数量的财政援助或支持。这些补贴可以采取多种形式，包括直接现金支付、税收减免或商品和服务的降价。实施设定补贴配额的意图通常是促进经济增长、保护地方产业或解决贫困和失业等社会问题。实施设定补贴配额的理由源于这样的信念：某些行业可能需要额外的支持才能有效地在市场中竞争。例如，可再生能源部门通常会获得补贴，以鼓励从化石燃料向更清洁能源的转型。通过设定补贴配额，政府旨在刺激对这些行业的投资，创造就业机会，并最终为更加可持续的经济做出贡献。然而，实施设定补贴配额并非没有挑战。批评者认为，这可能导致市场扭曲，资源配置效率低下。当政府偏爱某些行业而非其他行业时，可能会造成竞争和创新的缺乏。此外，还存在依赖风险，即行业变得依赖政府支持，而不是追求效率和自给自足。此外，设定补贴配额的过程可能受到政治因素的影响，这些因素可能并不总与经济理性一致。强大的利益集团的游说可能导致补贴被引导到那些基于经济可行性并不一定需要支持的行业。这可能导致公共资金的误配置，将资源从更具生产性的用途中转移。尽管存在这些担忧，设定补贴配额在审慎实施时也可以产生积极的结果。例如，在经济低迷时期，针对性的补贴可以帮助稳定关键行业，防止大规模失业。在这种情况下，设定补贴配额可以充当安全网，为企业和工人提供必要的支持。总之，设定补贴配额的做法代表了政府政策与市场动态之间的复杂互动。虽然它可以作为促进经济增长和稳定的工具，但也带来了必须谨慎管理的风险。政策制定者需要在为脆弱行业提供必要支持与确保整体市场保持竞争力和效率之间取得平衡。最终，设定补贴配额的有效性取决于深思熟虑的实施和持续的评估，以确保其达到预期目标而不造成意想不到的后果。