regressive taxation

简明释义

递减课税

英英释义

例句

1.Critics of regressive taxation (累退税制) argue that it exacerbates income inequality.

批评累退税制（regressive taxation）的人认为，它加剧了收入不平等。

2.In many developing countries, regressive taxation (累退税制) is prevalent, disproportionately affecting the poor.

在许多发展中国家，累退税制（regressive taxation）普遍存在，对穷人造成不成比例的影响。

3.The government has been criticized for relying on regressive taxation (累退税制) to fund essential services.

政府因依赖累退税制（regressive taxation）来资助基本服务而受到批评。

4.Many argue that sales taxes are a form of regressive taxation (累退税制) because they take a larger percentage of income from low earners.

许多人认为销售税是一种累退税制（regressive taxation），因为它对低收入者的收入占比更大。

5.Some politicians propose eliminating regressive taxation (累退税制) in favor of a more progressive tax system.

一些政治家提议取消累退税制（regressive taxation），转而采用更具进步性的税制。

作文

Regressive taxation is a term used to describe a tax system where the tax rate decreases as the income of the taxpayer increases. This means that individuals with lower incomes pay a higher percentage of their income in taxes compared to those with higher incomes. Understanding the implications of regressive taxation is crucial for evaluating economic policies and their effects on different segments of society.In many countries, regressive taxes can be found in forms such as sales taxes, excise taxes, and certain types of fees. For example, when a flat sales tax is applied to all goods and services, it disproportionately affects low-income individuals. A person earning $20,000 a year pays the same sales tax rate as someone earning $200,000. However, the lower-income individual spends a larger portion of their income on necessities, resulting in a heavier burden relative to their financial situation.Critics of regressive taxation argue that it exacerbates income inequality and places undue strain on the poor. Since lower-income households have less disposable income, they are more sensitive to price increases and tax burdens. This can lead to a vicious cycle where the poor become poorer, unable to invest in education, health care, or other opportunities that could improve their economic standing.On the other hand, proponents of regressive taxes often argue that they are necessary for generating revenue without discouraging high earners from investing and spending. They claim that progressive tax systems, which impose higher rates on the wealthy, can lead to tax avoidance strategies that ultimately reduce overall tax revenue. In contrast, regressive taxation can provide a more stable revenue stream by taxing consumption rather than income.However, the debate surrounding regressive taxation raises important ethical questions about fairness and equity. Many believe that a fair tax system should ensure that those who have the ability to pay more do so, thereby contributing to societal welfare. This perspective supports the idea of progressive taxation, where tax rates increase with income levels, ensuring that wealthier individuals contribute a fairer share.Furthermore, the impact of regressive taxation extends beyond mere financial implications. It influences social mobility and access to essential services. For instance, if low-income families are forced to allocate a significant portion of their income to taxes, they may struggle to afford quality education or health care. This lack of access can perpetuate cycles of poverty, making it difficult for future generations to break free from economic hardship.In conclusion, while regressive taxation may offer certain advantages in terms of revenue generation, its negative consequences on income inequality and social equity cannot be overlooked. Policymakers must carefully consider the balance between generating revenue and promoting a fair tax system that supports all citizens. As societies continue to grapple with economic disparities, understanding the implications of regressive taxation will be vital in shaping effective and equitable tax policies that benefit everyone.

累退税制是一个用来描述一种税收制度的术语，其中税率随着纳税人收入的增加而降低。这意味着低收入者支付的税款占其收入的比例高于高收入者。理解累退税制的影响对于评估经济政策及其对社会不同群体的影响至关重要。在许多国家，累退税可以以销售税、消费税和某些类型的费用的形式存在。例如，当对所有商品和服务征收统一的销售税时，它会对低收入个人产生不成比例的影响。年收入20,000美元的人与年收入200,000美元的人支付相同的销售税率。然而，低收入个体将更大比例的收入用于必需品，因此相对其财务状况承受的负担更重。批评者认为，累退税制加剧了收入不平等，并对贫困人群施加了过大的压力。由于低收入家庭可支配收入较少，他们对价格上涨和税负更为敏感。这可能导致一个恶性循环，使得穷人变得更加贫困，无法投资于教育、医疗或其他能够改善其经济状况的机会。另一方面，支持累退税的人常常辩称，它们是产生收入的必要手段，而不会阻碍高收入者的投资和消费。他们声称，进步税制，即对富人征收更高税率，可能导致避税策略，从而最终减少整体税收收入。与此相比，累退税制通过征税消费而非收入，可以提供更稳定的收入来源。然而，围绕累退税制的辩论引发了关于公平和公正的重要伦理问题。许多人认为，一个公平的税收制度应该确保那些有能力支付更多的人这样做，从而为社会福利做出贡献。这一观点支持了进步税制的理念，即税率随着收入水平的提高而增加，确保富裕个体贡献更公平的份额。此外，累退税制的影响不仅限于财务方面。它还影响社会流动性和基本服务的获取。例如，如果低收入家庭被迫将相当大比例的收入用于税收，他们可能会难以负担优质教育或医疗。这种缺乏获取可能会延续贫困循环，使未来几代人难以摆脱经济困境。总之，尽管累退税制在收入生成方面可能提供某些优势，但其对收入不平等和社会公正的负面影响不可忽视。决策者必须仔细考虑在产生收入和促进公平税制之间的平衡，以支持所有公民。随着社会继续应对经济差距，理解累退税制的影响将对制定有效且公平的税收政策至关重要。