object of pledge; hostage

简明释义

抵押物

英英释义

例句

1.The treaty included an agreement that each side would provide an object of pledge; hostage to guarantee compliance.

该条约包括一项协议，双方将提供一个抵押物；人质以保证遵守。

2.He felt guilty for having turned his friend into an object of pledge; hostage during the conflict.

在冲突中，他为把朋友变成一个抵押物；人质而感到内疚。

3.In ancient times, a child could be used as an object of pledge; hostage to ensure peace between tribes.

在古代，孩子可以作为抵押物；人质来确保部落之间的和平。

4.The kidnappers demanded a ransom for the return of their object of pledge; hostage.

绑匪要求支付赎金以换回他们的抵押物；人质。

5.The government offered an object of pledge; hostage in negotiations to secure the release of their citizens.

政府在谈判中提供了一个抵押物；人质以确保释放他们的公民。

作文

In the realm of international relations and diplomacy, the concept of an object of pledge; hostage plays a significant role in understanding the dynamics of power and negotiation. The term refers to a person or item that is held as security for the fulfillment of an agreement or to compel action from another party. This practice is often seen in conflicts where one side may take hostages to leverage negotiations or to ensure compliance with certain demands. The ethical implications of such actions are profound, as they raise questions about human rights, morality, and the consequences of using individuals as bargaining chips.Historically, the use of hostages has been documented in various cultures and eras. In ancient times, rulers would often take members of rival clans or nations as object of pledge; hostage to secure peace treaties or alliances. This practice was not merely a tactic of intimidation; it was a way to ensure that agreements were honored. If one party violated the terms of the agreement, the hostage could face dire consequences, thus creating a powerful incentive to adhere to the pact.In modern contexts, the situation has evolved, but the underlying principles remain similar. Terrorist organizations, for instance, frequently take hostages to gain attention, demand ransom, or make political statements. The media coverage surrounding such events often amplifies the pressure on governments to respond, leading to complex moral dilemmas. Should a government negotiate with terrorists and risk encouraging further hostage-taking, or should it stand firm, potentially endangering the lives of innocent individuals? These questions highlight the intricate balance between ethical considerations and pragmatic responses in crisis situations.Furthermore, the psychological impact of being a object of pledge; hostage cannot be understated. Individuals taken hostage often endure severe trauma, isolation, and fear for their lives. The experience can lead to long-term psychological effects, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Understanding the human cost of such actions is crucial for policymakers and negotiators who must navigate these treacherous waters. It is essential to consider the welfare of the individuals involved and seek solutions that prioritize their safety while addressing the underlying issues that led to the hostage situation in the first place.In conclusion, the term object of pledge; hostage encapsulates a complex interplay of power, ethics, and human rights in both historical and contemporary contexts. As we continue to confront conflicts around the world, it is vital to approach these situations with a nuanced understanding of the implications of taking hostages. By doing so, we can strive towards resolutions that respect human dignity and promote peace rather than perpetuating cycles of violence and retribution.

在国际关系和外交领域，object of pledge; hostage的概念在理解权力和谈判的动态方面发挥着重要作用。这个术语指的是作为履行协议的担保或迫使另一方采取行动的人或物品。这种做法常常出现在冲突中，其中一方可能会劫持人质以利用谈判或确保遵守某些要求。这种行为的伦理影响是深远的，因为它引发了关于人权、道德和将个人作为谈判筹码后果的问题。历史上，劫持人质的做法在各种文化和时代中都有记载。在古代，统治者通常会将敌对部落或国家的成员作为object of pledge; hostage来确保和平条约或联盟。这种做法不仅仅是一种恐吓策略；它还是确保协议得到遵守的一种方式。如果一方违反了协议的条款，人质可能会面临严重后果，从而创造出强大的激励机制来遵守协议。在现代背景下，情况有所演变，但基本原则仍然相似。例如，恐怖组织经常劫持人质以获取关注、要求赎金或发表政治声明。围绕此类事件的媒体报道往往加大了政府的压力，导致复杂的道德困境。政府是否应该与恐怖分子谈判，以免鼓励进一步的劫持，还是应该坚定立场，可能危及无辜者的生命？这些问题突显了在危机情况下伦理考量与务实反应之间的微妙平衡。此外，作为object of pledge; hostage的个体所承受的心理影响不可低估。被劫持的人往往经历严重的创伤、孤立和对生命的恐惧。这种经历可能导致长期的心理影响，包括创伤后应激障碍（PTSD）。理解这种行为的人性成本对于政策制定者和谈判者来说至关重要，他们必须在这些危险的水域中航行。考虑到相关个体的福祉，并寻求优先保护他们安全的解决方案，同时解决导致劫持事件的根本问题是至关重要的。总之，术语object of pledge; hostage概括了历史和当代背景下权力、伦理和人权之间复杂的相互作用。随着我们继续面对世界各地的冲突，重要的是以细致入微的理解来处理这些情况，考虑到劫持人质的影响。通过这样做，我们可以努力朝着尊重人类尊严和促进和平的解决方案迈进，而不是延续暴力和报复的循环。