negative income tax

简明释义

低收入补助［美国］

英英释义

例句

1.Under the negative income tax 负所得税 system, individuals earning below a certain threshold receive payments from the government.

在负所得税 negative income tax制度下，收入低于某一阈值的个人将从政府获得补助。

2.The concept of negative income tax 负所得税 was first introduced by economist Milton Friedman.

经济学家米尔顿·弗里德曼首次提出了负所得税 negative income tax的概念。

3.Many economists believe that implementing a negative income tax 负所得税 could reduce poverty significantly.

许多经济学家认为，实施负所得税 negative income tax可以显著减少贫困。

4.Some argue that a negative income tax 负所得税 could simplify welfare programs.

有人认为，负所得税 negative income tax可以简化福利项目。

5.The government proposed a new policy that includes a negative income tax 负所得税 to support low-income families.

政府提出了一项新政策，包括一种支持低收入家庭的负所得税 negative income tax。

作文

The concept of negative income tax has been a topic of debate among economists and policymakers for several decades. This innovative approach to taxation aims to alleviate poverty and provide financial support to low-income individuals and families. Essentially, a negative income tax system would allow individuals earning below a certain threshold to receive payments from the government, rather than paying taxes. This idea was popularized by economist Milton Friedman in the 1960s, who argued that it could simplify the welfare system and encourage work while providing a safety net for the most vulnerable members of society.One of the main advantages of a negative income tax is its potential to reduce poverty rates significantly. By providing direct financial assistance to those in need, it can help cover essential living expenses such as food, housing, and healthcare. This support can empower individuals to pursue education or job training, ultimately leading to better employment opportunities. Furthermore, a negative income tax can eliminate the stigma often associated with traditional welfare programs, as it treats all citizens as contributors to the economy, regardless of their income level.Critics of the negative income tax argue that it may discourage work by creating a disincentive for low-income individuals to seek employment. They fear that if people know they will receive government assistance regardless of their work status, some may choose not to work at all. However, proponents counter this argument by highlighting that the negative income tax is designed to gradually decrease benefits as income rises, thus encouraging individuals to find jobs and improve their financial situations without losing crucial support abruptly.Another important aspect to consider is the administrative efficiency of a negative income tax system compared to existing welfare programs. Traditional welfare systems often involve complex eligibility requirements and bureaucratic hurdles that can deter individuals from accessing necessary aid. A negative income tax could streamline this process by simplifying how benefits are calculated and distributed, making it easier for those in need to receive assistance promptly.Moreover, the implementation of a negative income tax could potentially stimulate economic growth. By putting more money into the hands of low-income individuals, they are likely to spend it on goods and services, thereby boosting demand within the economy. This increased spending could lead to job creation and higher overall economic activity, benefiting society as a whole.In conclusion, the negative income tax presents an intriguing solution to combat poverty and improve the welfare system. While there are valid concerns regarding work disincentives and the potential for misuse, the benefits of providing direct financial assistance to those in need cannot be overlooked. As we continue to explore ways to create a more equitable society, the negative income tax deserves serious consideration as a viable option for reforming our approach to social safety nets and economic support for low-income individuals and families.

负所得税的概念在经济学家和政策制定者中已经成为了几十年来的辩论话题。这种创新的税收方法旨在减轻贫困并为低收入个人和家庭提供经济支持。基本上，负所得税制度允许收入低于某一阈值的个人从政府那里获得支付，而不是缴纳税款。这个想法在1960年代被经济学家米尔顿·弗里德曼所推广，他认为这可以简化福利体系，鼓励工作，同时为社会中最脆弱的成员提供安全网。负所得税的主要优点之一是其显著降低贫困率的潜力。通过向有需要的人提供直接的经济援助，它可以帮助支付生活必需品，如食品、住房和医疗保健。这种支持可以使个人有能力追求教育或职业培训，最终导致更好的就业机会。此外，负所得税可以消除与传统福利项目相关的污名，因为它将所有公民视为经济的贡献者，无论其收入水平如何。负所得税的批评者认为，这可能会通过为低收入个人创造不鼓励工作的激励来产生负面影响。他们担心，如果人们知道无论工作状态如何都会获得政府援助，有些人可能会选择不工作。然而，支持者反驳这一观点，强调负所得税旨在随着收入的增加逐渐减少福利，从而鼓励个人找到工作并改善他们的财务状况，而不会突然失去重要的支持。另一个需要考虑的重要方面是负所得税制度与现有福利项目相比的行政效率。传统的福利系统通常涉及复杂的资格要求和官僚障碍，这可能会阻止个人获得必要的援助。负所得税可以通过简化福利计算和分配的方式来简化这一过程，使有需要的人能够及时获得援助。此外，实施负所得税可能会刺激经济增长。通过将更多资金投入低收入个人的手中，他们可能会在商品和服务上花费这些钱，从而提升经济中的需求。这种支出的增加可能导致就业创造和整体经济活动的提高，最终使整个社会受益。总之，负所得税提供了一种引人注目的解决方案，以应对贫困并改善福利体系。尽管有关工作激励和滥用潜力的有效担忧，但向有需要的人提供直接经济援助的好处不可忽视。在我们继续探索创造更公平社会的方式时，负所得税值得认真考虑，作为改革我们对低收入个人和家庭的社会安全网和经济支持方法的可行选项。