chastiser

简明释义

英[tʃæˈstaɪzə]美[ˈtʃæstaɪzər]

n. 儆戒者；惩罚者

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.The cool-headed reckoner is the stern chastiser of the ecstatic visionary.

头脑冷静的计算者，是梦想家的严厉惩罚人。

2.The cool-headed reckoner is the stern chastiser of the ecstatic visionary.

头脑冷静的计算者，是梦想家的严厉惩罚人。

3.As a parent, I sometimes have to be the chastiser 惩罚者 to teach my children right from wrong.

作为父母，我有时不得不成为惩罚者，以教导我的孩子们分辨是非。

4.In many cultures, the role of the chastiser 惩罚者 is often taken by elders in the community.

在许多文化中，惩罚者的角色通常由社区中的长辈担任。

5.In the story, the king was a harsh chastiser 惩罚者 who did not tolerate any disobedience.

在这个故事中，国王是一位严厉的惩罚者，他不容忍任何不服从。

6.The teacher became the chastiser 惩罚者 when she caught the students cheating on the exam.

当老师发现学生在考试中作弊时，她成了惩罚者。

7.The coach acted as a chastiser 惩罚者 after the team lost the match due to poor discipline.

球队因纪律差而输掉比赛后，教练充当了惩罚者。

作文

In the realm of literature and moral philosophy, the concept of a chastiser (惩罚者) often emerges as a crucial character archetype. This figure embodies the principles of justice and discipline, serving as a reminder of the consequences that follow one's actions. The role of a chastiser can be seen in various narratives, from classic literature to modern storytelling, where they act as agents of accountability. Their presence is not merely punitive; it reflects a deeper understanding of morality and the necessity for order in society.Consider the classic tale of 'Les Misérables' by Victor Hugo. In this story, Inspector Javert serves as a quintessential chastiser (惩罚者), relentlessly pursuing the protagonist, Jean Valjean, who has committed theft in desperate circumstances. Javert’s unwavering commitment to the law symbolizes the rigid moral framework within which he operates. He believes that every crime must be punished, and thus, he embodies the role of a chastiser (惩罚者) who seeks to enforce justice at all costs. However, as the narrative unfolds, Hugo challenges the reader to reconsider the nature of justice and mercy, ultimately questioning whether the role of a chastiser (惩罚者) is always justified.In contrast, the character of Atticus Finch in Harper Lee's 'To Kill a Mockingbird' presents a different perspective on the idea of chastisement. While he does not fit the traditional mold of a chastiser (惩罚者), he embodies the spirit of moral guidance and correction. Atticus teaches his children about empathy and understanding, emphasizing that true justice comes from compassion rather than punishment. His approach highlights the importance of nurturing rather than chastising, suggesting that the role of a chastiser (惩罚者) can sometimes be counterproductive if it lacks the foundation of understanding.The duality of the chastiser (惩罚者) in literature reflects a broader societal debate about punishment and rehabilitation. In contemporary discussions surrounding criminal justice, the effectiveness of punitive measures versus rehabilitative approaches is a hotly contested topic. Proponents of rehabilitation argue that harsh punishment often fails to address the root causes of criminal behavior, while advocates for strict enforcement believe that a strong chastiser (惩罚者) is necessary to maintain social order. This dichotomy raises significant questions about the purpose of punishment: Is it to correct behavior, to seek revenge, or to protect society?Moreover, the role of a chastiser (惩罚者) extends beyond individual characters in literature; it permeates our understanding of societal norms and laws. Laws themselves can be seen as a form of chastisement, designed to guide behavior and impose consequences for wrongdoing. In this sense, society collectively acts as a chastiser (惩罚者), establishing boundaries that individuals are expected to respect. However, the challenge lies in ensuring that these laws are just and equitable, avoiding the pitfalls of becoming overly punitive.In conclusion, the figure of the chastiser (惩罚者) serves as a powerful symbol in literature and society, prompting us to explore the complexities of justice, morality, and human behavior. Whether through the lens of a relentless inspector or a compassionate father, the chastiser (惩罚者) compels us to reflect on our values and the systems we create to uphold them. As we navigate the intricacies of right and wrong, the lessons learned from these characters remind us that the path to justice is often fraught with ambiguity, requiring a balance between accountability and understanding.

在文学和道德哲学的领域中，chastiser（惩罚者）这一概念常常作为一个重要的人物原型出现。这个角色体现了正义和纪律的原则，提醒人们行动后果的重要性。chastiser（惩罚者）的角色可以在各种叙述中看到，从经典文学到现代故事，它们作为责任的代理人存在。它们的存在不仅仅是惩罚；它反映了对道德的更深刻理解，以及社会秩序必要性的认识。考虑维克多·雨果的经典故事《悲惨世界》。在这个故事中，警察局长贾维尔充当了典型的chastiser（惩罚者），不懈追捕主人公让·瓦尔让，后者因绝境而盗窃。贾维尔对法律的坚定承诺象征着他所运作的严格道德框架。他相信每一个罪行都必须受到惩罚，因此，他体现了一个chastiser（惩罚者）的角色，试图以任何代价来执行正义。然而，随着叙事的发展，雨果挑战读者重新考虑正义和慈悲的本质，最终质疑chastiser（惩罚者）的角色是否总是合理的。相比之下，哈珀·李的《杀死一只知更鸟》中的阿提克斯·芬奇则呈现了对惩罚这一观念的不同看法。虽然他并不符合传统的chastiser（惩罚者）模式，但他体现了道德指导和纠正的精神。阿提克斯教导他的孩子们同情和理解，强调真正的正义来自于怜悯而非惩罚。他的方法突显了培养而非惩罚的重要性，表明chastiser（惩罚者）的角色如果缺乏理解的基础，有时可能是适得其反的。文学中chastiser（惩罚者）的双重性反映了关于惩罚与康复的更广泛社会辩论。在当代围绕刑事司法的讨论中，惩罚措施与康复方法的有效性是一个备受争议的话题。康复倡导者认为，严厉的惩罚往往未能解决犯罪行为的根本原因，而严格执法的支持者则认为，强有力的chastiser（惩罚者）对于维护社会秩序是必要的。这种二元性引发了关于惩罚目的的重要问题：是为了纠正行为，寻求报复，还是保护社会？此外，chastiser（惩罚者）的角色超越了文学中的个体角色；它渗透到我们对社会规范和法律的理解中。法律本身可以被视为一种惩罚形式，旨在引导行为并对错误行为施加后果。从这个意义上说，社会集体充当了chastiser（惩罚者），建立了个体应尊重的界限。然而，挑战在于确保这些法律是公正和公平的，避免过于惩罚的陷阱。总之，chastiser（惩罚者）这一形象在文学和社会中作为一个强有力的象征，促使我们探索正义、道德和人类行为的复杂性。无论是通过一个无情的检察官还是一个富有同情心的父亲的视角，chastiser（惩罚者）迫使我们反思我们的价值观以及我们创造的维护这些价值观的系统。当我们在对与错的复杂性中航行时，这些角色所传达的教训提醒我们，通往正义的道路往往充满了模糊，要求在责任和理解之间找到平衡。