perjured

简明释义

英[ˈpɜːdʒəd]美[ˈpɜːrdʒərd]

adj. 伪证的；犯伪证罪的

v. 使发假誓；使做伪证（perjure 的过去分词）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.So the boy love is perjured every where.

所以爱情这孩子也就处处上当。

2.Witnesses lied and perjured themselves.

证人撒谎作伪证。

3.When a known killer is caught, but innocent witnesses are still killed and perjured testimony is conjured up from nowhere, the entire justice system is on shaky ground.

当已知的杀人者已被抓获，但是无辜的证人仍然惨遭杀害，并且伪证不知道就从哪里冒出来了，司法系统就会摇摇欲坠。

4.When a known killer is caught, but innocent witnesses are still killed and perjured testimony is conjured up from nowhere, the entire justice system is on shaky ground.

当已知的杀人者已被抓获，但是无辜的证人仍然惨遭杀害，并且伪证不知道就从哪里冒出来了，司法系统就会摇摇欲坠。

5.Perjured testimony is an obvious and flagrant affront to the basic concepts of judicial proceedings.

作伪证是明显和公然违背司法程序的基本概念。

6.The judge warned the jury about the seriousness of perjured 作伪证.

法官警告陪审团关于作伪证的严重性。

7.The witness was found to have perjured 作伪证 himself during the trial.

证人在审判中被发现作伪证。

8.She was accused of perjured 作伪证 after changing her story.

她在改变叙述后被指控作伪证。

9.If you are caught perjured 作伪证, you could face serious legal consequences.

如果你被抓到作伪证，可能会面临严重的法律后果。

10.The lawyer argued that his client had not perjured 作伪证 but had simply made a mistake.

律师辩称他的客户并没有作伪证，而只是犯了个错误。

作文

In the realm of justice, the integrity of testimony is paramount. When individuals step into a courtroom, they are expected to provide honest and truthful accounts of events. However, there are instances where this expectation is violated. One of the most serious breaches of trust in the judicial system is when a witness provides false testimony under oath. This act is known as being perjured, which refers to the deliberate act of lying after taking an oath to tell the truth. The consequences of such actions can be dire, not only for the individual who commits perjury but also for the integrity of the legal process itself.The concept of perjured testimony is deeply rooted in the principles of justice. A courtroom relies heavily on the testimonies of witnesses to establish facts and arrive at fair judgments. When a witness chooses to be perjured, they undermine the very foundation of the legal system. For instance, consider a scenario where a witness falsely claims to have seen someone commit a crime. This perjured testimony could lead to the wrongful conviction of an innocent person, while the true perpetrator remains free. Such outcomes highlight the severe implications of providing false information in a legal setting.Moreover, the repercussions of being perjured extend beyond the immediate case. The credibility of the judicial system is called into question when instances of perjury are uncovered. Public trust in legal institutions can wane if people believe that witnesses can lie without consequence. This erosion of trust can lead to a reluctance to participate in the judicial process, as potential witnesses may fear being implicated in a system that appears flawed or corrupt.Legal systems around the world take perjured testimony seriously. In many jurisdictions, the penalties for committing perjury can include fines, imprisonment, or both. These legal repercussions serve as a deterrent, reminding individuals of the gravity of their words when sworn to tell the truth. Additionally, courts often employ various measures to verify the credibility of witnesses, including cross-examination and corroborating evidence, to mitigate the risks associated with perjured statements.On a personal level, the decision to lie under oath can have profound effects on the individual who chooses to be perjured. Not only do they risk legal penalties, but they also face moral and ethical dilemmas. Living with the knowledge that one has lied can lead to feelings of guilt and shame. Furthermore, the social consequences of being labeled a liar can damage relationships and reputations, impacting both personal and professional lives.In conclusion, the act of being perjured is a serious offense that carries significant implications for individuals and society as a whole. It undermines the pursuit of justice and can lead to devastating consequences for innocent parties. As citizens, it is our responsibility to uphold the truth and ensure that our legal system remains a bastion of integrity. By understanding the importance of truthful testimony, we can contribute to a fairer and more just society, free from the shadows of perjured statements.

在司法领域，证词的完整性至关重要。当个人走进法庭时，他们被期望提供诚实和真实的事件陈述。然而，也有一些情况下这种期望被违反。司法系统中最严重的信任破坏之一是当证人在宣誓后提供虚假证词。这种行为被称为伪证，指的是在宣誓讲真话后故意撒谎的行为。这种行为的后果可能是严重的，不仅对实施伪证的人来说如此，对法律程序的完整性也是如此。伪证证词的概念根植于正义的原则之中。法庭在很大程度上依赖证人的证词来建立事实并做出公正的判断。当证人选择伪证时，他们破坏了法律制度的基础。例如，考虑一个场景，一个证人虚假声称看到某人犯罪。这种伪证证词可能导致无辜者被错误定罪，而真正的罪犯仍然逍遥法外。这种结果突显了在法律环境中提供虚假信息的严重影响。此外，伪证的后果超出了当前案件。当发现伪证时，司法系统的可信度会受到质疑。如果人们认为证人可以不受惩罚地撒谎，公众对法律机构的信任可能会减弱。这种信任的侵蚀可能导致人们不愿参与司法过程，因为潜在证人可能会担心自己被卷入一个看似有缺陷或腐败的系统。世界各地的法律系统都非常重视伪证证词。在许多司法管辖区，实施伪证的处罚可能包括罚款、监禁或两者兼而有之。这些法律后果作为一种威慑，提醒个人在宣誓讲真话时言辞的重要性。此外，法院通常采取各种措施来验证证人可信度，包括交叉询问和佐证证据，以降低与伪证声明相关的风险。在个人层面上，选择在宣誓下撒谎可能对选择伪证的个人产生深远的影响。他们不仅面临法律惩罚，还面临道德和伦理困境。生活在知道自己撒谎的事实中可能导致内疚和羞愧的感觉。此外，被贴上撒谎者标签的社会后果可能会损害人际关系和声誉，影响个人和职业生活。总之，成为伪证是一种严重的罪行，对个人和整个社会带来重大影响。它破坏了对正义的追求，并可能导致无辜方遭受毁灭性后果。作为公民，我们有责任维护真相，确保我们的法律系统仍然是诚信的堡垒。通过理解真实证词的重要性，我们可以为一个更加公正和公平的社会做出贡献，使其免受伪证声明的阴影。