full-line forcing; tie-in sale

简明释义

搭销

英英释义

例句

1.The company was accused of engaging in full-line forcing; tie-in sale by requiring retailers to carry its entire product range.

该公司被指控采用全线强迫销售；捆绑销售的方式，要求零售商必须销售其全部产品系列。

2.The FTC investigated the software company for potential full-line forcing; tie-in sale practices that could harm competition.

联邦贸易委员会调查了这家软件公司可能存在的全线强迫销售；捆绑销售行为，这可能会损害竞争。

3.Retailers often face pressure from manufacturers to engage in full-line forcing; tie-in sale, impacting their inventory choices.

零售商常常面临来自制造商的压力，参与全线强迫销售；捆绑销售，这影响了他们的库存选择。

4.Many consumers are unaware that they are victims of full-line forcing; tie-in sale when they purchase a printer and are forced to buy specific ink cartridges.

许多消费者并不知道，当他们购买打印机时被迫购买特定的墨盒，这实际上是遭遇了全线强迫销售；捆绑销售。

5.The legality of full-line forcing; tie-in sale varies by country, with some jurisdictions enforcing strict regulations.

在不同国家，全线强迫销售；捆绑销售的合法性各不相同，一些地区实施严格的监管。

作文

In the world of commerce, various strategies are employed by companies to maximize their profits and maintain a competitive edge. One such strategy that has garnered attention is the practice of full-line forcing; tie-in sale, which can significantly impact both consumers and competitors. Understanding this concept is essential for anyone interested in the dynamics of market behavior and consumer rights.The term full-line forcing; tie-in sale refers to a sales tactic where a seller requires a buyer to purchase a full range of products or services, rather than allowing them to choose individual items. This practice often occurs in industries where a company offers multiple products that are related to one another. For instance, a manufacturer of kitchen appliances may require retailers to stock not just one type of appliance, but all of their products, including blenders, toasters, and coffee makers. This approach can create a barrier for smaller retailers who may not have the financial capacity to stock an entire line of products.From a consumer perspective, full-line forcing; tie-in sale can lead to limited choices and higher prices. When a retailer is forced to carry a complete line of products, they may pass on the costs associated with purchasing unsold items to the consumer. As a result, shoppers might find themselves paying more for products they do not necessarily want or need. This practice can also stifle competition, as smaller companies may struggle to compete against larger firms that can afford to engage in such sales tactics.Moreover, the implications of full-line forcing; tie-in sale extend beyond just pricing and availability. It raises ethical questions about consumer freedom and choice. Consumers should have the right to select products based on their preferences and needs rather than being coerced into purchasing a bundled package. This is particularly concerning in markets where consumers are already facing limited options due to monopolistic practices.Legally, full-line forcing; tie-in sale can tread a fine line between acceptable business practices and anti-competitive behavior. In many jurisdictions, competition laws are in place to prevent companies from engaging in unfair practices that harm consumers or other businesses. Regulatory bodies often scrutinize such sales tactics to ensure that they do not violate antitrust laws. For example, if a dominant company uses full-line forcing; tie-in sale to eliminate competition, it could face legal challenges and penalties.Despite the potential drawbacks, some argue that full-line forcing; tie-in sale can benefit consumers by ensuring that they receive a complete product experience. For example, when purchasing a computer, a consumer may be encouraged to buy software that complements the hardware, potentially leading to greater satisfaction with the overall product. However, this argument hinges on the assumption that consumers have the freedom to make informed choices, which may not always be the case.In conclusion, the practice of full-line forcing; tie-in sale presents a complex interplay of benefits and drawbacks within the marketplace. While it can lead to increased sales for companies and potentially enhance consumer experiences, it also raises significant concerns regarding consumer choice, pricing, and competition. As consumers become more aware of these practices, it is crucial for businesses to operate transparently and ethically, ensuring that they do not exploit their market power at the expense of their customers. Understanding full-line forcing; tie-in sale is vital for anyone navigating the complexities of modern commerce and advocating for fair market practices.

在商业世界中，各种策略被公司用来最大化利润并保持竞争优势。其中一种引起关注的策略是全线强迫; 捆绑销售，这可能对消费者和竞争对手产生重大影响。理解这一概念对任何对市场行为和消费者权益动态感兴趣的人来说都是至关重要的。术语全线强迫; 捆绑销售指的是一种销售策略，卖方要求买方购买一整套产品或服务，而不是允许他们选择单个项目。这种做法通常发生在公司提供多种相关产品的行业。例如，厨房电器制造商可能要求零售商不仅要库存一种电器，还要库存所有产品，包括搅拌机、烤面包机和咖啡机。这种方法可能会为较小的零售商创造障碍，因为他们可能没有财力去库存整条产品线。从消费者的角度来看，全线强迫; 捆绑销售可能导致选择有限和价格上涨。当零售商被迫携带完整的产品线时，他们可能会将与购买未售出商品相关的成本转嫁给消费者。因此，购物者可能会发现自己为不必要或不想要的产品支付更多。这种做法还可能抑制竞争，因为较小的公司可能难以与能够负担这种销售策略的大型公司竞争。此外，全线强迫; 捆绑销售的影响超越了定价和可用性。它引发了关于消费者自由和选择的伦理问题。消费者应该有权根据自己的偏好和需求选择产品，而不是被迫购买捆绑包。这在消费者已经因垄断行为面临有限选择的市场中尤其令人担忧。在法律上，全线强迫; 捆绑销售可能在可接受的商业实践和反竞争行为之间走钢丝。在许多司法管辖区，竞争法旨在防止公司进行损害消费者或其他企业的不公平行为。监管机构通常会审查此类销售策略，以确保其不违反反垄断法。例如，如果一家主导公司使用全线强迫; 捆绑销售来消除竞争，它可能面临法律挑战和处罚。尽管存在潜在的缺点，但一些人认为全线强迫; 捆绑销售可以通过确保消费者获得完整的产品体验来使消费者受益。例如，在购买计算机时，消费者可能会被鼓励购买与硬件互补的软件，从而可能提高对整体产品的满意度。然而，这一论点依赖于消费者能够自由做出明智选择的假设，而这并不总是如此。总之，全线强迫; 捆绑销售的做法在市场中呈现出复杂的利弊关系。虽然它可能导致公司销售增加并可能增强消费者体验，但也引发了有关消费者选择、定价和竞争的重大担忧。随着消费者对这些做法的认识不断提高，企业在透明和道德方面运营至关重要，确保他们不会以牺牲客户利益为代价来利用市场力量。理解全线强迫; 捆绑销售对于任何应对现代商业复杂性并倡导公平市场实践的人来说都是至关重要的。