modalism
简明释义
n. 形态论，变形说
英英释义
单词用法
同义词
反义词
例句
1.It did not help that one of his very vocal opponents marcellus of ancyra did in fact border dangerously on modalism .
安吉拉的马赛路，他的一位强烈反对者，其观点事实上的确与形态论很危险地接近；这实在于事无补。
让我们谈谈形态论。
3.It did not help that one of his very vocal opponents marcellus of ancyra did in fact border dangerously on modalism .
安吉拉的马赛路，他的一位强烈反对者，其观点事实上的确与形态论很危险地接近；这实在于事无补。
4.The concept of modalism suggests that God reveals Himself in different modes or forms.
概念上的模态主义表明，上帝以不同的方式或形式显现自己。
5.Critics of modalism argue that it undermines the distinct persons of the Trinity.
批评模态主义的人认为，它削弱了三位一体的不同位格。
6.The debate over modalism has been a significant topic in Christian theology.
关于模态主义的辩论一直是基督教神学中的一个重要话题。
7.In discussions about the nature of God, modalism is often contrasted with trinitarianism.
在关于上帝本质的讨论中，模态主义常常与三位一体主义形成对比。
8.Some early church fathers rejected modalism as a heretical view of the Trinity.
一些早期教父拒绝了将模态主义视为对三位一体的异端观点。
作文
In the study of Christian theology, the term modalism refers to a specific view of the nature of God that emerged in the early centuries of the church. This theological perspective posits that God is a single entity who reveals Himself in different modes or forms throughout history, rather than existing as three distinct persons: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. The roots of modalism can be traced back to the early church fathers, such as Sabellius, who articulated this understanding in response to the complexities surrounding the doctrine of the Trinity. While modalism attempts to simplify the concept of God by emphasizing His unity, it has been critiqued for undermining the relational aspects of the Trinity, which are central to orthodox Christian belief.The implications of modalism extend beyond mere theological debate; they touch upon the very nature of worship and relationship with God. If God operates merely in different modes, it raises questions about the personal relationship believers can have with each aspect of the Trinity. For instance, how does one pray to the Father if He is simply a mode of the one God? This question highlights a significant concern within modalism: it risks reducing the dynamic interaction that Christians experience with the divine.Moreover, modalism has often been viewed as a heretical stance by mainstream Christianity, particularly because it denies the co-equal and co-eternal nature of the three persons of the Trinity. The Nicene Creed, established in 325 AD, explicitly affirms the belief in one God in three persons, thus rejecting any notion that would reduce God to a singular mode of existence. This historical context is crucial for understanding why modalism remains a contentious topic in theological discussions today.In contemporary Christianity, the resurgence of modalism can sometimes be seen in certain movements that emphasize the oneness of God while downplaying the distinct roles of Jesus and the Holy Spirit. This revival prompts a necessary dialogue within the church about the importance of maintaining a balanced view of God’s nature. While the desire to present God as unified is commendable, it must not come at the expense of the rich and diverse ways in which God interacts with humanity.In conclusion, modalism presents a fascinating yet controversial perspective on the nature of God. Its emphasis on the oneness of God challenges believers to think critically about their faith and the doctrines they uphold. However, the historical and theological critiques of modalism remind us of the importance of maintaining a robust understanding of the Trinity. As Christians navigate these complex discussions, it is essential to engage with both the scriptural foundations and the historical developments of these beliefs to foster a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of God’s nature. Ultimately, the conversation surrounding modalism serves as a reminder of the richness and depth of Christian theology, inviting believers to explore the mystery of God in all His fullness.
模态主义是基督教神学中的一个特定观点，该观点在教会早期世纪出现。这个神学视角认为，神是一个单一的实体，在历史上以不同的模式或形式显现，而不是作为三位不同的人存在：父、子和圣灵。模态主义的根源可以追溯到早期教父，如萨贝利乌斯，他在回应有关三位一体教义的复杂性时阐述了这一理解。虽然模态主义试图通过强调神的统一性来简化神的概念，但它因削弱三位一体的关系方面而受到批评，这是正统基督教信仰的核心。模态主义的影响超越了单纯的神学辩论；它涉及到与神的崇拜和关系的本质。如果神仅以不同的模式运作，那么信徒与三位一体的每个方面之间的个人关系就会引发疑问。例如，如果父亲只是唯一神的一种模式，信徒如何向他祈祷？这个问题突显了模态主义中的一个重大关切：它有可能降低基督徒所经历的与神的动态互动。此外，模态主义常常被主流基督教视为异端立场，特别是因为它否认三位一体的三位是同等和永恒的。公元325年建立的尼西亚信经明确肯定了对三位一体中一位神的信仰，从而拒绝了任何将神简化为单一存在模式的观念。这一历史背景对于理解为何模态主义在当今神学讨论中仍然是一个有争议的话题至关重要。在当代基督教中，某些运动中对模态主义的复兴有时可以看到，这些运动强调神的独一性，同时淡化耶稣和圣灵的独特角色。这一复兴促使教会内进行必要的对话，讨论保持对神本性的平衡观点的重要性。虽然希望将神呈现为统一是值得赞赏的，但这不应以牺牲神与人类互动的丰富多样性为代价。总之，模态主义提出了一种引人入胜但有争议的关于神本性的观点。它对神的独一性强调挑战信徒对信仰及其坚守的教义进行批判性思考。然而，对模态主义的历史和神学批评提醒我们保持对三位一体的强大理解的重要性。当基督徒在这些复杂的讨论中前行时，接触到这些信仰的圣经基础和历史发展是至关重要的，以培养对神本质的更深刻和更全面的理解。最终，围绕模态主义的对话提醒我们基督教神学的丰富性和深度，邀请信徒探索神在其所有丰盈中的奥秘。
