primary boycott

简明释义

初级抵制

英英释义

例句

1.The workers decided to initiate a primary boycott to protest against unfair labor practices.

工人们决定发起初级抵制以抗议不公平的劳动实践。

2.During the campaign, they emphasized the importance of a primary boycott to gain public support.

在运动期间，他们强调了初级抵制的重要性，以获得公众支持。

3.The organization launched a primary boycott against brands that did not adhere to ethical sourcing.

该组织对那些不遵循道德采购的品牌发起了初级抵制。

4.The primary boycott was aimed at pressuring the government to change its policies.

这场初级抵制旨在迫使政府改变其政策。

5.As part of their strategy, the activists called for a primary boycott of the company's products.

作为他们策略的一部分，活动家们呼吁对该公司的产品进行初级抵制。

作文

A primary boycott is a strategic tool often employed by labor unions, social movements, or activist groups to exert pressure on a target entity, typically an employer or corporation. This form of protest aims to persuade the target to change its policies or practices by encouraging consumers or supporters to refrain from purchasing its products or services. The concept of a primary boycott is rooted in the belief that economic pressure can lead to significant changes in behavior and policy. By refusing to engage with the target economically, activists hope to draw attention to their cause and mobilize public support.Historically, primary boycotts have played a vital role in various social justice movements. For instance, during the Civil Rights Movement in the United States, activists organized boycotts against businesses that practiced racial discrimination. The Montgomery Bus Boycott of 1955-1956 is a prime example, where African Americans refused to use the city’s buses until segregation laws were abolished. This primary boycott was instrumental in raising awareness about the injustices faced by African Americans and ultimately led to significant legal and social changes.In addition to civil rights, primary boycotts have been used in labor disputes. When workers are unhappy with their working conditions or wages, unions may call for a primary boycott against the company involved. This tactic not only pressures the company financially but also rallies community support for the workers' cause. An example of this is the United Farm Workers’ boycott of grapes in the 1970s, which aimed to improve labor conditions for farmworkers. The success of this primary boycott showcased the power of collective action and consumer solidarity.The effectiveness of a primary boycott largely depends on several factors, including the level of public awareness about the issues at hand, the overall support from the community, and the ability to sustain the boycott over time. A well-organized primary boycott can lead to significant financial losses for the targeted entity, compelling it to reconsider its policies. However, if the boycott lacks public support or fails to communicate its message clearly, it may not achieve its intended goals.In the digital age, social media has transformed the landscape of primary boycotts. Activists can quickly spread information and mobilize supporters across vast distances. Campaigns can go viral, leading to widespread participation in a primary boycott. For example, the #BoycottNRA movement gained traction after mass shootings in the United States, with many companies cutting ties with the National Rifle Association in response to public pressure. This demonstrates how a primary boycott can leverage modern communication tools to amplify its impact.Despite their potential for success, primary boycotts also face criticism. Some argue that they can harm innocent employees who are not responsible for the policies of their employers. Additionally, there is the risk of backlash from those who oppose the boycott, which can create further division within communities. Therefore, it is essential for organizers of a primary boycott to consider the broader implications of their actions and strive for inclusive dialogue.In conclusion, a primary boycott is a powerful method of protest that has historically contributed to social change. While it requires careful planning and community support, its ability to apply economic pressure makes it a formidable tool in the fight for justice and equality. As society continues to evolve, so too will the tactics employed by activists, ensuring that the legacy of the primary boycott remains relevant in contemporary struggles for change.

“初级抵制”是一种战略工具，通常由工会、社会运动或激进组织使用，以对目标实体施加压力，通常是雇主或公司。这种抗议形式旨在通过鼓励消费者或支持者停止购买其产品或服务来说服目标改变其政策或做法。“初级抵制”的概念源于这样的信念：经济压力可以导致行为和政策的重大变化。通过拒绝在经济上与目标进行互动，活动家希望引起公众对其事业的关注并动员公众支持。历史上，“初级抵制”在各种社会正义运动中发挥了重要作用。例如，在美国的民权运动期间，活动家组织了针对那些实施种族歧视的企业的抵制。1955年至1956年的蒙哥马利公交抵制就是一个典型例子，非裔美国人拒绝使用城市的公交车，直到废除种族隔离法。这场“初级抵制”在提高人们对非裔美国人所面临的不公正待遇的认识方面发挥了重要作用，并最终导致了重大的法律和社会变革。除了民权之外，“初级抵制”还被用于劳动争议。当工人对工作条件或工资不满时，工会可能会呼吁对相关公司进行“初级抵制”。这一策略不仅在经济上对公司施加压力，还能团结社区对工人事业的支持。1970年代，美国农工联合会对葡萄的抵制便是一个例子，旨在改善农场工人的劳动条件。这场“初级抵制”的成功展示了集体行动和消费者团结的力量。“初级抵制”的有效性在很大程度上取决于几个因素，包括公众对相关问题的认识水平、社区的整体支持以及持续抵制的能力。一个组织良好的“初级抵制”能够给目标实体带来显著的经济损失，从而迫使其重新考虑政策。然而，如果抵制缺乏公众支持或未能清晰传达其信息，可能无法实现预期目标。在数字时代，社交媒体改变了“初级抵制”的格局。活动家可以快速传播信息并动员来自广泛地区的支持者。运动可以迅速传播，导致“初级抵制”的广泛参与。例如，#BoycottNRA运动在美国发生大规模枪击事件后获得了关注，许多公司因公众压力与全国步枪协会断绝关系。这表明“初级抵制”如何利用现代传播工具来增强其影响力。尽管“初级抵制”具有成功的潜力，但也面临批评。一些人认为，它可能会伤害那些对雇主政策不负责任的无辜员工。此外，抵制可能会遭到反对者的反弹，这可能在社区内部造成进一步的分裂。因此，“初级抵制”的组织者必须考虑其行动的更广泛影响，并努力实现包容性对话。总之，“初级抵制”是一种强有力的抗议方法，历史上为社会变革做出了贡献。尽管它需要仔细的规划和社区支持，但其施加经济压力的能力使其成为争取正义和平等斗争中的一种强大工具。随着社会的不断发展，活动家所采用的策略也将不断演变，确保“初级抵制”的遗产在当代变革斗争中保持相关性。