discriminating monopoly

简明释义

差别价格的垄断

英英释义

例句

1.The software company uses a discriminating monopoly strategy by offering discounts to students while charging businesses full price.

这家公司通过对学生提供折扣，而对企业收取全价，采用了差别垄断策略。

2.A discriminating monopoly can maximize profits by charging higher prices to consumers with less price sensitivity.

通过向对价格不敏感的消费者收取更高的价格，差别垄断可以最大化利润。

3.In the pharmaceutical industry, companies often engage in discriminating monopoly practices by setting different prices for the same drug in various countries.

在制药行业，公司通常通过在不同国家为同一种药物设定不同的价格来进行差别垄断行为。

4.Telecommunications firms may exhibit discriminating monopoly behavior by providing exclusive plans for different customer segments.

电信公司可能表现出差别垄断行为，为不同的客户群体提供独特的套餐。

5.The airline operates as a discriminating monopoly by charging different prices for the same flight based on the time of booking.

这家航空公司作为一个差别垄断运营，根据预订时间对同一航班收取不同的价格。

作文

In the realm of economics, the concept of a discriminating monopoly is crucial for understanding how markets operate under certain conditions. A discriminating monopoly refers to a market structure where a single seller has the power to set prices for different consumers based on their willingness to pay. This type of monopoly can lead to various outcomes in terms of efficiency and equity within the market. To illustrate this concept, consider a company that sells software products. If the company identifies that some customers are willing to pay a higher price for premium features while others are only willing to pay a lower price for basic functionalities, it can implement a pricing strategy that charges different prices to different segments of the market. This practice is known as price discrimination, and it is a hallmark of a discriminating monopoly. The advantages of a discriminating monopoly can be significant. For one, it allows the monopolist to capture more consumer surplus, which translates into higher profits. By charging higher prices to those who can afford them, the company can subsidize lower prices for more price-sensitive consumers. This can lead to increased accessibility for certain products or services, allowing a broader range of consumers to benefit from innovations that might otherwise be priced out of reach.However, the existence of a discriminating monopoly also raises ethical and practical concerns. Critics argue that this type of pricing strategy can lead to inequities in access, as not all consumers have the same ability to pay. Furthermore, it can create barriers for new entrants in the market, as established monopolists can leverage their pricing power to maintain dominance and stifle competition. Moreover, the long-term implications of a discriminating monopoly can be detrimental to the overall health of the market. While the monopolist may benefit in the short term, the lack of competition can lead to complacency and reduced innovation over time. Consumers may find themselves locked into a system where they have limited choices, ultimately leading to a decrease in consumer welfare. Regulatory bodies often scrutinize discriminating monopolies to ensure that they do not abuse their power. Antitrust laws are designed to prevent unfair practices and encourage competition, which can help mitigate the negative effects associated with monopolistic behavior. By fostering a competitive environment, regulators aim to ensure that consumers have access to a variety of products at fair prices, promoting both innovation and consumer choice.In conclusion, the concept of a discriminating monopoly is a double-edged sword in the field of economics. While it can lead to increased profits and potential benefits for consumers, it also poses significant risks related to equity and market health. Understanding this complex dynamic is essential for policymakers, businesses, and consumers alike as they navigate the challenges and opportunities presented by monopolistic practices in today's economy.

在经济学领域，‘歧视性垄断’的概念对于理解市场在某些条件下如何运作至关重要。‘歧视性垄断’指的是一种市场结构，其中单一卖方有权根据消费者的支付意愿设定不同的价格。这种类型的垄断可能会导致市场效率和公平性的各种结果。为了说明这一概念，考虑一家销售软件产品的公司。如果该公司发现一些客户愿意为高级功能支付更高的价格，而另一些客户只愿意为基本功能支付较低的价格，它可以实施一种定价策略，根据市场的不同细分向不同的消费者收取不同的价格。这种做法被称为价格歧视，是‘歧视性垄断’的一个标志。‘歧视性垄断’的优势可能是显著的。首先，它使垄断者能够捕获更多的消费者剩余，这转化为更高的利润。通过向能够支付更高价格的消费者收取更高价格，公司可以为对价格敏感的消费者提供补贴，从而降低他们的价格。这可以提高某些产品或服务的可及性，使更广泛的消费者群体受益于本可能超出其承受能力的创新。然而，‘歧视性垄断’的存在也引发了伦理和实际问题。批评者认为，这种定价策略可能导致获取渠道的不平等，因为并非所有消费者都有相同的支付能力。此外，它可能会为新进入市场的企业制造障碍，因为既有垄断者可以利用其定价权来维持主导地位并抑制竞争。此外，‘歧视性垄断’的长期影响可能对市场的整体健康产生不利影响。虽然垄断者在短期内可能受益，但缺乏竞争可能导致他们的自满和创新减少。消费者可能发现自己被锁定在一个选择有限的系统中，最终导致消费者福利的下降。监管机构通常会审查‘歧视性垄断’，以确保它们不会滥用权力。反垄断法旨在防止不公平的做法并鼓励竞争，这可以帮助减轻与垄断行为相关的负面影响。通过促进竞争环境，监管者旨在确保消费者能够以公平的价格获得多样化的产品，从而促进创新和消费者选择。总之，‘歧视性垄断’的概念在经济学领域是把双刃剑。虽然它可能导致利润增加和对消费者的潜在好处，但它也带来了与公平性和市场健康相关的重大风险。理解这一复杂动态对于政策制定者、企业和消费者在应对当今经济中垄断实践所带来的挑战和机遇时至关重要。