corporation farm

简明释义

公司农场［美国］

英英释义

例句

1.The environmental practices of corporation farms（企业农场） are often under scrutiny.

大型corporation farms（企业农场）的环境做法常常受到审查。

2.The rise of corporation farms（企业农场） has changed the landscape of rural employment.

大型corporation farms（企业农场）的兴起改变了农村就业的格局。

3.Many farmers are concerned about the impact of large corporation farms（企业农场） on local agriculture.

许多农民担心大型corporation farms（企业农场）对当地农业的影响。

4.In recent years, the number of corporation farms（企业农场） has significantly increased.

近年来，corporation farms（企业农场）的数量显著增加。

5.Some argue that corporation farms（企业农场） can produce food more efficiently than smaller farms.

有人认为，corporation farms（企业农场）比小型农场更有效率地生产食品。

作文

In recent years, the concept of a corporation farm has gained significant attention in discussions about agriculture and food production. A corporation farm refers to a large-scale farming operation that is owned and operated by a corporation rather than individual farmers. These farms typically utilize advanced technology and industrial farming practices to maximize efficiency and output. This model of farming has both its advocates and critics, sparking a debate about the future of agriculture.Proponents of corporation farms argue that they are essential for meeting the growing global demand for food. As the world’s population continues to rise, traditional farming methods may not be sufficient to produce enough food. Corporation farms, with their ability to invest in technology and infrastructure, can produce crops at a much larger scale than family-owned farms. They often employ modern techniques such as precision agriculture, which uses data analytics and satellite imagery to optimize planting and harvesting processes. This can lead to higher yields and more efficient use of resources like water and fertilizers.Moreover, corporation farms often have better access to capital, allowing them to invest in research and development. This can result in innovations that benefit the entire agricultural sector, such as genetically modified organisms (GMOs) that are resistant to pests or diseases. By producing more resilient crops, these farms can contribute to food security, especially in regions that are vulnerable to climate change and other environmental challenges.However, critics argue that corporation farms pose several risks to local communities and the environment. One major concern is the impact on small-scale farmers. As corporation farms expand, they may drive smaller farms out of business, leading to a loss of livelihoods and traditional farming practices. This consolidation of land ownership can also result in reduced biodiversity, as large farms often focus on monoculture – the cultivation of a single crop over a wide area.Additionally, there are environmental concerns associated with corporation farms. The intensive farming practices employed by these operations can lead to soil degradation, water depletion, and increased pesticide use, which can harm local ecosystems. Critics argue that the prioritization of profit over sustainability can have long-lasting negative effects on the environment and public health.Furthermore, the social implications of corporation farms cannot be overlooked. The concentration of power and resources in the hands of a few corporations can undermine local economies and reduce food sovereignty. Communities may become reliant on these large entities for their food supply, which can lead to vulnerability if the corporation faces financial difficulties or decides to change its business model.In conclusion, the rise of corporation farms presents both opportunities and challenges for the agricultural sector. While they have the potential to increase food production and drive innovation, it is crucial to consider the broader implications of this farming model. Balancing the needs of large-scale production with the preservation of small farms and sustainable practices will be essential in shaping the future of agriculture. Policymakers, consumers, and farmers must work together to ensure that the benefits of corporation farms do not come at the expense of local communities and the environment.

近年来，‘公司农场’的概念在农业和食品生产的讨论中引起了显著关注。‘公司农场’指的是由公司而非个体农民拥有和运营的大规模农业经营。这些农场通常利用先进的技术和工业化的农业实践来最大化效率和产量。这种农业模式有其支持者和反对者，引发了关于农业未来的辩论。‘公司农场’的支持者认为，它们对于满足全球日益增长的食品需求至关重要。随着世界人口的持续增长，传统农业方法可能不足以生产足够的食物。‘公司农场’能够投资于技术和基础设施，可以比家庭农场更大规模地生产作物。它们通常采用现代技术，如精准农业，利用数据分析和卫星图像来优化种植和收割过程。这可以带来更高的产量和更有效的资源利用，如水和肥料。此外，‘公司农场’通常更容易获得资金，使它们能够投资于研究和开发。这可能导致整个农业部门受益的创新，例如抗虫害或疾病的转基因生物（GMO）。通过生产更具韧性的作物，这些农场可以为食品安全做出贡献，特别是在那些易受气候变化和其他环境挑战影响的地区。然而，批评者认为，‘公司农场’对地方社区和环境构成了若干风险。一个主要的担忧是对小规模农民的影响。随着‘公司农场’的扩张，它们可能会将较小的农场挤出市场，导致生计和传统农业实践的丧失。这种土地所有权的集中也可能导致生物多样性的减少，因为大型农场往往专注于单一作物的种植——即在广泛区域内种植单一作物。此外，与‘公司农场’相关的环境问题也不可忽视。这些经营所采用的密集农业实践可能导致土壤退化、水资源枯竭和农药使用增加，这可能对当地生态系统造成伤害。批评者认为，利润优先于可持续性可能对环境和公共健康产生长期的负面影响。此外，‘公司农场’的社会影响也不容小觑。少数公司手中权力和资源的集中可能削弱地方经济并减少食品主权。社区可能会变得依赖这些大型实体来提供食品供应，这可能导致脆弱性，如果公司面临财务困难或决定改变商业模式。总之，‘公司农场’的崛起为农业部门带来了机遇和挑战。虽然它们有潜力提高食品生产和推动创新，但考虑这种农业模式的更广泛影响至关重要。在平衡大规模生产的需求与小农场和可持续实践的保护之间，将是塑造农业未来的关键。政策制定者、消费者和农民必须共同努力，以确保‘公司农场’的好处不会以牺牲地方社区和环境为代价。