sciolism

简明释义

英[ˈsaɪəˌlɪzəm]美[ˈsaɪəˌlɪzəm]

n. 一知半解，浅薄的知识

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.His arguments were dismissed as mere sciolism, lacking depth and understanding.

他的论点被视为仅仅是肤浅主义，缺乏深度和理解。

2.The professor warned his students against sciolism when discussing complex theories.

教授警告学生在讨论复杂理论时要避免肤浅主义。

3.In debates, sciolism often leads to misunderstandings and oversimplifications.

在辩论中，肤浅主义常常导致误解和过于简单化。

4.She approached the subject with a sense of sciolism, thinking she knew more than she actually did.

她以一种肤浅主义的态度接触这个主题，认为自己知道的比实际更多。

5.Critics pointed out that the article was filled with sciolism rather than substantial research.

批评者指出这篇文章充满了肤浅主义而不是实质性的研究。

作文

In today's fast-paced world, where information is readily available at our fingertips, it is easy to fall into the trap of superficial knowledge. This phenomenon can be summed up by the term sciolism, which refers to a shallow or pretentious understanding of a subject. Many individuals pride themselves on being 'well-informed' about various topics, yet their grasp often remains surface-level, lacking depth and critical insight. sciolism can be particularly dangerous in an age where opinions are shared widely through social media platforms, leading to the spread of misinformation and half-truths.Consider the field of science, for instance. With the rise of social media, many people feel empowered to discuss complex scientific concepts without fully understanding them. This is where sciolism becomes apparent. A person may read a few articles or watch a couple of videos on climate change and then feel qualified to debate the issue passionately. However, without a solid foundation in the underlying science, their arguments may lack validity and contribute to the confusion rather than clarity.Moreover, sciolism is not limited to scientific discourse; it permeates politics, economics, and even art. In political discussions, individuals often express strong opinions based on headlines or soundbites, neglecting the need for comprehensive analysis. This superficial engagement leads to polarization, as people cling to simplified narratives that reinforce their existing beliefs, rather than engaging with the complexities of the issues at hand.The consequences of sciolism extend beyond mere misunderstandings; they can lead to significant societal issues. For example, during elections, voters may make decisions based on misleading information or incomplete knowledge about candidates and policies. This not only undermines the democratic process but also perpetuates a cycle of ignorance that can have long-lasting effects on governance and public policy.To combat sciolism, it is essential to cultivate a culture of critical thinking and deep learning. Educational institutions play a vital role in this process by encouraging students to engage with material in a meaningful way. Rather than promoting rote memorization or superficial learning, educators should emphasize the importance of inquiry, analysis, and synthesis of information. By fostering these skills, students can develop a more nuanced understanding of complex subjects, equipping them to navigate the vast sea of information available today.Additionally, individuals must take personal responsibility for their learning. This means seeking out reputable sources, questioning assumptions, and being willing to revise one's views in light of new evidence. Engaging in thoughtful discussions with others, especially those with differing perspectives, can also help to deepen understanding and reduce the prevalence of sciolism.In conclusion, while the age of information offers unprecedented access to knowledge, it also presents challenges in the form of sciolism. To ensure that we are well-informed citizens, it is crucial to move beyond superficial understandings and strive for deeper engagement with the subjects that matter. Only then can we hope to foster a society that values critical thinking, informed discourse, and ultimately, a greater understanding of the world around us.

在当今快节奏的世界中，信息触手可及，人们很容易陷入肤浅知识的陷阱。这种现象可以用术语sciolism来概括，指对某一主题的肤浅或做作的理解。许多人以“见多识广”为荣，然而他们的掌握往往停留在表面，缺乏深度和批判性的洞察力。sciolism在社交媒体平台上广泛传播意见的时代尤其危险，导致错误信息和半真半假的传播。以科学领域为例。随着社交媒体的兴起，许多人感到有能力讨论复杂的科学概念，而没有充分理解它们。这就是sciolism显现出来的地方。一个人可能阅读几篇文章或观看几段关于气候变化的视频，然后觉得自己有资格热情地辩论这个问题。然而，如果没有扎实的基础，他们的论点可能缺乏有效性，反而会导致混淆而非清晰。此外，sciolism不仅限于科学讨论；它渗透到政治、经济甚至艺术中。在政治讨论中，个人经常根据标题或短小的言论表达强烈的观点，忽视了全面分析的必要性。这种肤浅的参与导致了两极分化，因为人们坚持简化的叙事，强化了他们现有的信念，而不是与问题的复杂性进行互动。sciolism的后果不仅仅是误解；它们还可能导致重大的社会问题。例如，在选举期间，选民可能根据误导性的信息或对候选人和政策的不完整了解做出决策。这不仅削弱了民主过程，还延续了无知的循环，对治理和公共政策产生长期影响。为了对抗sciolism，培养批判性思维和深入学习的文化至关重要。教育机构在这一过程中发挥着重要作用，通过鼓励学生以有意义的方式与材料互动，而不是促进死记硬背或肤浅学习，强调探究、分析和综合信息的重要性。通过培养这些技能，学生可以对复杂主题形成更细致的理解，使他们能够驾驭当今海量的信息。此外，个人必须对自己的学习承担责任。这意味着要寻找可靠的来源，质疑假设，并愿意在新证据面前修正自己的观点。与他人，尤其是持不同观点的人进行深入讨论，也可以帮助加深理解并减少sciolism的普遍性。总之，尽管信息时代提供了前所未有的知识获取机会，但也带来了sciolism的挑战。为了确保我们成为博学的公民，至关重要的是超越肤浅的理解，努力深入参与重要主题。只有这样，我们才能希望培养一个重视批判性思维、知情讨论以及最终对周围世界有更深刻理解的社会。