damnum absque injuria

简明释义

不能认可的损害［申请赔偿中的］

英英释义

例句

1.My friend was upset when his favorite park was closed for renovations, but I reminded him that sometimes changes lead to damnum absque injuria 无损害而无不法.

我的朋友对他最喜欢的公园因翻新而关闭感到不满，但我提醒他，有时变化会导致damnum absque injuria 无损害而无不法。

2.The court ruled that the business suffered losses due to the competitor's actions, but since they were lawful, it was considered damnum absque injuria 无损害而无不法.

法院裁定，该企业由于竞争对手的行为遭受损失，但由于这些行为是合法的，因此被视为damnum absque injuria 无损害而无不法。

3.In a case where a tree from my property fell onto my neighbor's fence during a storm, I realized that it was just an accident and thus it was a clear example of damnum absque injuria 无损害而无不法.

在我家的一棵树在暴风雨中倒在邻居的围栏上时，我意识到这只是一个意外，因此这是一个明显的damnum absque injuria 无损害而无不法的例子。

4.When the construction of the new highway reduced the value of my property, I learned that there is no legal recourse for damnum absque injuria 无损害而无不法.

当新高速公路的建设降低了我财产的价值时，我了解到对于damnum absque injuria 无损害而无不法是没有法律救济的。

5.The loss of access to the beach due to a private development is unfortunate, but it falls under damnum absque injuria 无损害而无不法 as it was legally permitted.

由于私人开发而失去进入海滩的权利虽然令人遗憾，但由于这是合法允许的，因此属于damnum absque injuria 无损害而无不法。

作文

The concept of damnum absque injuria is a fundamental principle in tort law that refers to damage or loss that does not give rise to a legal claim. In other words, it signifies that not all harm or injury results in the right to compensation. This principle is crucial in distinguishing between mere misfortune and actionable injuries. Understanding damnum absque injuria helps to clarify the boundaries of legal liability and the conditions under which one can seek redress for their grievances.To illustrate this concept, consider a scenario where a person suffers financial losses due to a change in market conditions. For instance, if a farmer's crop yield decreases because of an unexpected drought, this farmer incurs a significant loss. However, the drought is a natural event and not the result of another party's negligence or wrongdoing. In this case, the farmer cannot sue anyone for these losses, as they fall under the category of damnum absque injuria—the loss is real, but there is no legal injury caused by another party.Another example can be drawn from the world of business. If a competitor develops a new product that renders another company's offerings less desirable, the latter may experience a decline in sales. While this situation might seem unfair and harmful, it does not constitute damnum absque injuria because the competitor has not engaged in any unlawful conduct. The decline in sales is a natural consequence of competition in a free market, and thus, the affected company has no legal recourse.Understanding damnum absque injuria is important for individuals and businesses alike, as it helps them navigate the complexities of legal claims. It emphasizes that not every negative outcome warrants legal action. This principle encourages individuals to assess the circumstances carefully before pursuing litigation, as the law requires a clear link between the harm suffered and the actions of another party.Moreover, the application of damnum absque injuria can also be seen in cases involving emotional distress. For instance, if a person witnesses an accident but is not directly involved and does not suffer physical harm, they may experience emotional distress. However, unless there are specific laws allowing recovery for such emotional damages, the individual cannot claim compensation. This scenario further illustrates how damnum absque injuria operates within the legal system, underscoring the need for a tangible injury to warrant a claim.In conclusion, the principle of damnum absque injuria serves as a vital guideline in tort law, helping to delineate the line between legitimate claims and mere grievances. By understanding this concept, individuals can better navigate their rights and obligations within the legal framework. It reminds us that while harm can occur in various forms, not all harm is actionable, and legal remedies are reserved for instances where a true legal injury has been established. Thus, the knowledge of damnum absque injuria equips individuals with a clearer understanding of their legal standing and the importance of substantiating claims with evidence of actual wrongdoing.

“damnum absque injuria”是侵权法中的一个基本原则，指的是损害或损失并不引发法律索赔。换句话说，它意味着并非所有的伤害或损失都会导致索赔的权利。这个原则在区分单纯的不幸和可诉的伤害方面至关重要。理解damnum absque injuria有助于澄清法律责任的边界以及在何种情况下可以寻求对其不满的补救措施。为了说明这一概念，可以考虑一个场景：一个人因市场条件的变化而遭受经济损失。例如，如果一位农民的作物产量因意外干旱而减少，这位农民就会遭受重大损失。然而，干旱是一种自然事件，并不是另一方的过失或错误行为所导致。在这种情况下，农民不能起诉任何人，因为这些损失属于damnum absque injuria的范畴——损失是真实的，但没有其他方造成的法律伤害。另一个例子可以从商业世界中得出。如果一家竞争对手开发了一种新产品，使另一家公司的产品变得不那么受欢迎，那么后者可能会经历销售下降。虽然这种情况可能看起来不公平且有害，但它并不构成damnum absque injuria，因为竞争对手没有进行任何非法行为。销售下降是自由市场竞争的自然结果，因此受影响的公司没有法律依据。理解damnum absque injuria对个人和企业来说都很重要，因为它帮助他们驾驭法律索赔的复杂性。它强调，并非每个负面结果都值得进行法律行动。这个原则鼓励个人在追求诉讼之前仔细评估情况，因为法律要求必须明确存在损害和他人行为之间的联系。此外，damnum absque injuria的适用也可以在涉及情感困扰的案件中看到。例如，如果一个人目睹了一起事故，但没有直接参与其中，也没有受到身体伤害，他们可能会经历情感困扰。然而，除非有特定法律允许对此类情感损害进行赔偿，否则个人无法提出索赔。这种情况进一步说明了damnum absque injuria在法律体系中的运作，强调了需要实际伤害的必要性，以支持索赔。总之，damnum absque injuria原则作为侵权法中的一个重要指南，帮助划定合法索赔与单纯不满之间的界限。通过理解这一概念，个人可以更好地驾驭其在法律框架内的权利和义务。它提醒我们，虽然伤害可以以各种形式发生，但并非所有伤害都是可诉的，法律救济仅保留给那些真正建立了法律伤害的实例。因此，了解damnum absque injuria为个人提供了更清晰的法律地位理解，以及证明索赔与实际不当行为之间联系的重要性。