victimless

简明释义

英[ˈvɪktɪmləs]美[ˈvɪktɪmləs]

adj. 不侵害他人的，无受害人的（犯罪行为等）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.For the duration of a Ponzi scheme, it may seem like a victimless crime.

在行骗的过程中，庞氏骗局似乎是一个没有受害者的犯罪案件。

2.Others assume it's a victimless offense.

也有些人认为这是无害过错。

3.She said the manufacture of pirate DVDs, most of which are sold on street corners and in pubs across the UK, was not a victimless crime.

她同时指出，制造盗版DVD——其中大部分DVD是在英国各地的街角和酒吧进行贩卖——并不是一个没有受害人的犯罪行为。

4.Intellectual property crimes are not victimless.

知识产权犯罪并不是没有受害人的。

5.Fourth, there is no victimless crime.

第四点，不存在无被害人犯罪。

6.If you think it's a victimless crime, consider the case of publisher Stardock.

如果你认为这是一种不侵害他人利益的犯罪的话，想想Stardock的例子吧。

7.She said the manufacture of pirate DVDs, most of which are sold on street corners and in pubs across the UK, was not a victimless crime.

她同时指出，制造盗版DVD——其中大部分DVD是在英国各地的街角和酒吧进行贩卖——并不是一个没有受害人的犯罪行为。

8.As this definition makes clear, enforcing the laws against victimless crimes is difficult.

正如该定义说清楚了的那样，执行反对无受害人的犯罪的法律是困难的。

9.The debate around victimless crimes often centers on personal freedom versus societal harm.

关于无受害者犯罪的辩论常常围绕个人自由与社会危害之间展开。

10.Prostitution is often considered a victimless activity, as both parties consent to the exchange.

卖淫通常被视为一种无受害者的活动，因为双方都同意这种交换。

11.In some jurisdictions, laws against certain victimless crimes have been relaxed or repealed.

在某些法域，针对某些无受害者犯罪的法律已被放宽或废除。

12.Some believe that gambling is a victimless vice, as long as players are aware of the risks involved.

一些人认为赌博是一种无受害者的恶习，只要玩家意识到相关风险即可。

13.Many people argue that drug use is a victimless crime, as it primarily affects the individual involved.

许多人认为吸毒是一种无受害者的犯罪，因为它主要影响的是个人。

作文

In modern society, the concept of a victimless crime is often debated among legal scholars, sociologists, and the general public. A victimless crime refers to an act that is considered illegal but does not directly harm or violate the rights of another individual. This notion challenges traditional views on morality and legality, as it raises questions about the role of government in regulating personal behavior. One of the most common examples of a victimless crime is drug use. Many argue that when individuals choose to use drugs, they are only harming themselves and should not be subject to criminal penalties. This perspective highlights the importance of personal freedom and autonomy in making choices about one's body and mind. However, opponents of this view argue that drug use can lead to broader societal issues, such as increased healthcare costs and crime rates related to drug trafficking. Another example of a victimless crime is prostitution. In many jurisdictions, selling sex is illegal, yet advocates for sex workers argue that this activity is consensual and should not be criminalized. They contend that by legalizing and regulating prostitution, society can better protect the rights and health of sex workers, reducing the stigma and dangers associated with their profession. Critics of this argument maintain that prostitution inherently exploits individuals, particularly women, and can contribute to human trafficking and other forms of exploitation. The debate surrounding victimless crimes extends to other areas, such as gambling and certain forms of online behavior. For instance, many states in the U.S. have legalized gambling, recognizing that adults should have the right to make their own choices regarding risk and entertainment. However, concerns about addiction and the social consequences of gambling persist. Similarly, activities like downloading music or movies illegally are often labeled as victimless crimes, as the argument is made that no one is directly harmed. Yet, artists and creators argue that such actions undermine their livelihoods and the integrity of creative industries. The discussion of victimless crimes also intersects with issues of social justice and inequality. Marginalized communities often bear the brunt of law enforcement efforts targeting victimless crimes, leading to disproportionate incarceration rates and social stigma. This raises ethical questions about whose behaviors are criminalized and why, prompting calls for reform in how laws are applied and enforced. Ultimately, the concept of victimless crimes challenges us to reconsider the boundaries of legality and morality in our society. We must weigh the implications of personal freedom against the potential social harms that may arise from allowing certain behaviors. As we navigate these complex issues, it is essential to engage in open dialogue and consider diverse perspectives to arrive at a more just and equitable understanding of what it means to live in a free society.

在现代社会中，‘无受害者’犯罪的概念常常在法律学者、社会学家和公众之间引发争论。‘无受害者’犯罪是指被认为是非法的行为，但并不直接伤害或侵犯他人的权利。这一概念挑战了传统的道德和法律观，因为它引发了关于政府在规范个人行为中角色的问题。最常见的‘无受害者’犯罪例子是吸毒。许多人认为，当个体选择使用毒品时，他们只是在伤害自己，不应受到刑事处罚。这种观点强调了个人自由和自主权在做出身体和心理选择时的重要性。然而，反对者则认为，吸毒可能导致更广泛的社会问题，例如医疗费用增加和与毒品贩运相关的犯罪率上升。另一个‘无受害者’犯罪的例子是卖淫。在许多司法管辖区，卖淫是非法的，但性工作者的倡导者认为，这一活动是自愿的，不应被刑事化。他们主张，通过合法化和规范卖淫，社会可以更好地保护性工作者的权利和健康，减少与其职业相关的污名和危险。批评者则坚持认为，卖淫本质上剥削个人，尤其是女性，并可能助长人口贩卖和其他形式的剥削。围绕‘无受害者’犯罪的辩论还扩展到赌博和某些形式的在线行为等其他领域。例如，美国的许多州已合法化赌博，承认成年人应该有权就风险和娱乐做出自己的选择。然而，对成瘾和赌博社会后果的担忧仍然存在。同样，像非法下载音乐或电影这样的活动常常被贴上‘无受害者’犯罪的标签，因为有人认为没有人受到直接伤害。然而，艺术家和创作者则认为，这种行为破坏了他们的生计和创意产业的完整性。‘无受害者’犯罪的讨论还与社会正义和不平等问题交织在一起。边缘化社区往往承受着针对‘无受害者’犯罪的执法努力的重压，导致监禁率和社会污名的不成比例。这引发了关于哪些行为被刑事化以及为何如此的伦理问题，促使人们呼吁改革法律的适用和执行方式。最终，‘无受害者’犯罪的概念挑战我们重新考虑法律和道德在社会中的界限。我们必须权衡个人自由的影响与允许某些行为可能带来的社会危害之间的关系。在应对这些复杂问题时，进行开放的对话并考虑多元的观点至关重要，以便达成对自由社会生活的更公正和公平的理解。