qualification of the opinion

简明释义

保留意见

英英释义

例句

1.The lawyer provided a qualification of the opinion regarding the contract's enforceability.

律师对合同的可执行性提供了意见的限定。

2.In her report, she included a qualification of the opinion to clarify her stance on the issue.

在她的报告中，她包含了意见的限定以澄清她对该问题的立场。

3.Before making a decision, it's important to consider any qualification of the opinion expressed by the experts.

在做决定之前，考虑专家们表达的任何意见的限定是很重要的。

4.The professor's lecture featured a qualification of the opinion on the ethical implications of genetic engineering.

教授的讲座中涉及了对基因工程伦理影响的意见的限定。

5.The article contained a qualification of the opinion that addressed potential biases in the research.

这篇文章包含了针对研究潜在偏见的意见的限定。

作文

In today's world, where information is abundant and opinions are diverse, understanding the concept of qualification of the opinion becomes increasingly vital. The phrase refers to the conditions or limitations that accompany a particular viewpoint, emphasizing that no opinion is absolute or universal. This notion is particularly important in discussions that involve complex issues such as politics, ethics, and social justice.When we express an opinion, it is often shaped by our experiences, beliefs, and the context in which we find ourselves. Therefore, recognizing the qualification of the opinion allows us to appreciate that our perspective may not encompass the entirety of a situation. For example, a politician might advocate for a specific policy based on their understanding of economic data. However, their opinion could be qualified by factors like regional differences, socioeconomic conditions, or even personal biases. By acknowledging these qualifications, we can engage in more meaningful dialogues that consider multiple viewpoints.Moreover, the qualification of the opinion is crucial in academic and professional settings. In research, scholars often present findings with caveats, clarifying the limitations of their studies. For instance, a medical researcher might conclude that a new drug is effective but also highlight that the results are based on a small sample size. This qualification is essential for readers to understand the context and applicability of the findings. Without such qualifications, opinions can lead to misinterpretations and misguided actions.In everyday conversations, embracing the qualification of the opinion fosters empathy and respect for differing viewpoints. When discussing contentious topics, such as climate change or immigration, recognizing that others may have valid reasons for their beliefs can pave the way for constructive dialogue. Instead of dismissing opposing views outright, we can ask questions and seek to understand the qualifications behind those opinions. This approach not only enriches our understanding but also promotes a culture of open-mindedness.Furthermore, in the realm of social media, the need to recognize the qualification of the opinion becomes even more pronounced. With the rapid spread of information and the tendency for polarizing content, it is easy to fall into echo chambers where only similar opinions are validated. By critically evaluating the qualifications of various opinions presented online, we can better navigate the complexities of social discourse. This critical thinking skill is essential for discerning fact from opinion and for making informed decisions.In conclusion, the qualification of the opinion serves as a reminder that our perspectives are often limited and shaped by various factors. By acknowledging these qualifications, we can enhance our understanding of complex issues, engage in respectful dialogues, and foster a more inclusive society. Whether in academic research, political discussions, or casual conversations, the ability to recognize and articulate the qualifications of our opinions is a valuable skill that contributes to personal growth and collective understanding.

在当今信息丰富、观点多样的世界中，理解“意见的资格”这一概念变得越来越重要。这个短语指的是伴随特定观点的条件或限制，强调没有任何观点是绝对或普遍的。这一概念在涉及政治、伦理和社会正义等复杂问题的讨论中尤为重要。当我们表达一个观点时，它往往受到我们的经历、信仰以及我们所处环境的影响。因此，认识到意见的资格使我们能够理解，我们的视角可能并不能涵盖情况的全部。例如，某位政治家可能基于对经济数据的理解倡导某项特定政策。然而，他们的观点可能会受到地区差异、社会经济条件甚至个人偏见等因素的限制。通过承认这些资格，我们可以参与更有意义的对话，考虑多个观点。此外，在学术和专业环境中，意见的资格至关重要。在研究中，学者们通常会附带警告，阐明他们研究的局限性。例如，一位医学研究人员可能会得出新药有效的结论，但也会强调结果是基于小样本量。这种资格对于读者理解研究结果的背景和适用性至关重要。如果没有这样的资格，观点可能会导致误解和错误的行动。在日常对话中，接受意见的资格能够促进对不同观点的同情和尊重。当讨论气候变化或移民等争议性话题时，认识到他人可能有合理理由支持他们的信念，可以为建设性的对话铺平道路。我们不应该直接驳斥对立观点，而是可以提出问题，寻求理解这些观点背后的资格。这种方法不仅丰富了我们的理解，而且促进了开放心态的文化。此外，在社交媒体领域，认识到意见的资格的必要性变得更加明显。信息传播迅速，加上内容极化的倾向，容易让人陷入只验证相似观点的回音室。通过批判性地评估在线呈现的各种观点的资格，我们可以更好地应对社会话语的复杂性。这种批判性思维能力对于辨别事实与观点、做出明智决策至关重要。总之，意见的资格提醒我们，我们的观点往往是有限的，受各种因素的影响。通过承认这些资格，我们可以增强对复杂问题的理解，参与尊重的对话，并促进一个更具包容性的社会。无论是在学术研究、政治讨论还是日常对话中，识别并表达我们观点的资格是一项宝贵的技能，有助于个人成长和集体理解。