protective tariff doctrine

简明释义

保护关税主义

英英释义

例句

1.Many economists argue that the protective tariff doctrine can lead to higher prices for consumers.

许多经济学家认为，保护性关税理论可能导致消费者价格上涨。

2.The government implemented the protective tariff doctrine to shield local industries from foreign competition.

政府实施了保护性关税理论以保护本地产业免受外国竞争的影响。

3.Critics of the protective tariff doctrine believe it can provoke trade wars between nations.

批评保护性关税理论的人认为这可能引发国家之间的贸易战争。

4.During the debate, the senator emphasized the importance of the protective tariff doctrine for job creation.

在辩论中，参议员强调了保护性关税理论对创造就业机会的重要性。

5.The protective tariff doctrine was a key element in the economic policy of the late 19th century.

在19世纪末，保护性关税理论是经济政策的关键元素。

作文

The concept of protective tariff doctrine has played a significant role in shaping economic policies throughout history. A protective tariff is a tax imposed on imported goods, designed to protect domestic industries from foreign competition. This doctrine supports the idea that by raising the price of foreign products, domestic consumers will be encouraged to buy local goods, thereby stimulating the national economy. The protective tariff doctrine is often rooted in the belief that protecting local jobs and industries is essential for a country’s economic stability and growth.Historically, the protective tariff doctrine gained prominence during the late 18th and early 19th centuries in the United States. The government implemented various tariffs to foster the growth of nascent American industries, especially in the wake of the Industrial Revolution. By imposing tariffs on imported goods, the U.S. aimed to create a favorable environment for domestic manufacturers, allowing them to compete more effectively against foreign products. This doctrine was particularly evident in the Tariff of 1816, which aimed to protect American textile manufacturers from British competition.Supporters of the protective tariff doctrine argue that it is crucial for emerging economies. They contend that without protective measures, local industries may struggle to survive against established foreign competitors who can produce goods at lower costs due to economies of scale. By implementing tariffs, governments can nurture local businesses, allowing them to grow and eventually become competitive on a global scale.However, the protective tariff doctrine is not without its critics. Opponents argue that such tariffs can lead to higher prices for consumers, as they limit the availability of cheaper foreign goods. Additionally, protectionist policies can provoke retaliation from other countries, leading to trade wars that can harm all parties involved. Critics also point out that relying too heavily on protectionism can stifle innovation and efficiency, as domestic industries may become complacent without the pressure of foreign competition.In modern times, the protective tariff doctrine has resurfaced in various forms, particularly in discussions surrounding globalization and free trade agreements. Some nations have adopted protectionist measures in response to perceived threats from international trade, arguing that these policies are necessary to safeguard jobs and industries. The recent rise of populist movements around the world has also brought the protective tariff doctrine back into the spotlight, as leaders advocate for policies that prioritize national interests over global cooperation.In conclusion, the protective tariff doctrine is a complex and often contentious issue in economic policy. While it aims to protect domestic industries and promote economic growth, it also raises concerns about consumer prices and international relations. As countries navigate the challenges of a globalized economy, the debate over the relevance and effectiveness of the protective tariff doctrine will likely continue, highlighting the delicate balance between protectionism and free trade. Ultimately, finding a middle ground that fosters both domestic growth and international cooperation may be essential for sustainable economic development.

保护性关税理论在历史上对经济政策的形成发挥了重要作用。保护性关税是对进口商品征收的税，旨在保护国内产业免受外国竞争的影响。这一理论支持这样的观点：通过提高外国产品的价格，国内消费者将被鼓励购买本地商品，从而刺激国家经济。保护性关税理论通常根植于保护当地就业和产业对于一个国家经济稳定与增长的重要性这一信念。历史上，保护性关税理论在美国的18世纪末和19世纪初变得突出。政府实施各种关税，以促进新兴的美国工业的发展，尤其是在工业革命的背景下。通过对进口商品征收关税，美国旨在为国内制造商创造一个有利的环境，使他们能够更有效地与外国产品竞争。这一理论在1816年的关税中尤为明显，该关税旨在保护美国纺织制造商免受英国竞争的影响。保护性关税理论的支持者认为，它对新兴经济体至关重要。他们辩称，如果没有保护措施，当地产业可能会在与能够以较低成本生产商品的成熟外国竞争对手的竞争中苦苦挣扎。通过实施关税，政府可以培养地方企业，使它们成长并最终在全球范围内变得具有竞争力。然而，保护性关税理论并非没有批评者。反对者认为，这种关税可能会导致消费者价格上涨，因为它限制了更便宜的外国商品的可用性。此外，保护主义政策可能会引发其他国家的报复，导致贸易战，损害所有相关方。批评者还指出，过度依赖保护主义可能会抑制创新和效率，因为当地产业在没有外国竞争压力的情况下可能变得自满。在现代，保护性关税理论以各种形式重新浮现，特别是在围绕全球化和自由贸易协议的讨论中。一些国家在感知到国际贸易威胁时采取了保护主义措施，辩称这些政策对于保护就业和产业是必要的。最近，全球范围内民粹主义运动的崛起也将保护性关税理论重新推向了聚光灯下，因为领导人倡导优先考虑国家利益而非全球合作的政策。总之，保护性关税理论是经济政策中一个复杂且常具争议的问题。尽管其旨在保护国内产业并促进经济增长，但也引发了关于消费者价格和国际关系的担忧。随着各国应对全球化经济的挑战，保护性关税理论的相关性和有效性的辩论可能会继续，突显出保护主义与自由贸易之间微妙的平衡。最终，找到一个既能促进国内增长又能促进国际合作的中间立场，可能对可持续经济发展至关重要。