distribution according to value

简明释义

按价值分配

英英释义

例句

1.The company decided to implement a new policy for the distribution according to value of products, ensuring that high-quality items are prioritized.

公司决定实施一项新政策，进行根据价值的分配，确保高质量的产品优先。

2.During the project, we will ensure the distribution according to value of tasks among team members to maximize efficiency.

在项目期间，我们将确保团队成员之间的任务根据价值的分配，以最大化效率。

3.Our investment strategy relies heavily on the distribution according to value of assets to minimize risk.

我们的投资策略在很大程度上依赖于资产的根据价值的分配，以降低风险。

4.The charity uses a model of distribution according to value to allocate funds to various initiatives based on their impact.

该慈善机构采用根据价值的分配模型，根据各项计划的影响力分配资金。

5.In our community program, we focus on the distribution according to value of resources to help those in greatest need.

在我们的社区项目中，我们专注于资源的根据价值的分配，以帮助最需要帮助的人。

作文

In today's world, the concept of fairness and equity is often discussed in various contexts, from economics to social justice. One important principle that emerges in these discussions is the idea of distribution according to value, which refers to the allocation of resources, rewards, or opportunities based on the perceived worth or contribution of individuals or entities. This principle can be applied in numerous fields, including business, education, and public policy, and understanding it is crucial for fostering a fair society.To illustrate the concept, consider a workplace scenario where employees are rewarded based on their performance. In an ideal situation, those who contribute more to the company's success would receive higher bonuses or promotions. This is an example of distribution according to value, as the rewards are not given equally but rather reflect the input and effectiveness of each employee's work. Such a system can motivate employees to strive for excellence, knowing that their efforts will be recognized and compensated accordingly.However, the implementation of distribution according to value is not without challenges. Determining the value of an individual's contribution can be subjective and may vary depending on the criteria used for evaluation. For instance, in creative fields, measuring someone's impact can be complex, as the outcomes of their work may not be immediately visible or quantifiable. This subjectivity can lead to disputes and feelings of unfairness among employees, undermining the very purpose of a value-based distribution system.Moreover, the principle of distribution according to value raises questions about equity and inclusivity. While it is important to reward high achievers, it is equally essential to ensure that everyone has access to opportunities that allow them to demonstrate their value. If certain groups are systematically disadvantaged, the distribution of rewards may perpetuate existing inequalities. Therefore, organizations must strive to create an environment where all individuals have the chance to succeed and be recognized for their contributions.In the realm of education, distribution according to value can also play a significant role. Scholarships and grants are often awarded based on academic performance, extracurricular involvement, or community service. This approach aims to support students who exhibit exceptional potential or dedication. However, it is crucial to consider the barriers that some students may face in accessing quality education. A purely meritocratic system may overlook the fact that not all students start from the same place, and additional support may be necessary to level the playing field.In conclusion, the principle of distribution according to value serves as a guiding framework for allocating resources and rewards in various sectors. While it has the potential to promote motivation and excellence, it also poses challenges related to subjectivity, equity, and inclusivity. Striking a balance between recognizing individual contributions and ensuring fair access to opportunities is essential for fostering a just and thriving society. As we continue to navigate the complexities of modern life, embracing the nuances of this principle will be vital in creating systems that truly reflect our values and aspirations for equality and fairness.

在当今世界，公平和公正的概念经常在各种背景下被讨论，从经济到社会正义。一个重要的原则在这些讨论中浮现出来，那就是根据价值分配的理念，这指的是根据个人或实体的感知价值或贡献来分配资源、奖励或机会。这一原则可以应用于多个领域，包括商业、教育和公共政策，理解它对于促进一个公平的社会至关重要。为了说明这一概念，可以考虑一个工作场所的场景，在这个场景中，员工的奖励是基于他们的表现。在理想情况下，那些对公司成功贡献更多的人将获得更高的奖金或晋升。这是根据价值分配的一个例子，因为奖励不是平等给予的，而是反映了每位员工工作输入和效率的结果。这种制度可以激励员工追求卓越，因为他们知道自己的努力会得到相应的认可和补偿。然而，实施根据价值分配并非没有挑战。确定个人贡献的价值可能是主观的，并且可能根据用于评估的标准而有所不同。例如，在创意领域，衡量某人的影响力可能很复杂，因为他们工作的结果可能并非立即可见或可量化。这种主观性可能导致争议和不公平感，破坏了基于价值的分配系统的初衷。此外，根据价值分配的原则引发了关于公平和包容性的问题。虽然奖励高成就者很重要，但同样重要的是确保每个人都有机会来展示他们的价值。如果某些群体系统性地处于不利地位，奖励的分配可能会延续现有的不平等。因此，组织必须努力创造一个环境，让所有人都有机会成功并获得对其贡献的认可。在教育领域，根据价值分配同样可以发挥重要作用。奖学金和助学金通常是根据学术表现、课外活动参与或社区服务颁发的。这种方法旨在支持那些表现出卓越潜力或奉献精神的学生。然而，必须考虑到一些学生在接受优质教育时可能面临的障碍。一个纯粹的功绩主义系统可能会忽视并非所有学生都从同一起点出发的事实，而额外的支持可能是必要的，以便平衡竞争环境。总之，根据价值分配的原则为各个领域资源和奖励的分配提供了指导框架。虽然它有可能促进动力和卓越，但它也带来了与主观性、公平性和包容性相关的挑战。在承认个人贡献与确保公平获取机会之间取得平衡，对于促进一个公正和繁荣的社会至关重要。随着我们继续应对现代生活的复杂性，拥抱这一原则的细微差别将在创建真正反映我们价值观和对平等与公正的期望的系统中至关重要。