sliding-scale royalty

简明释义

按滑动费率支付专利权税

英英释义

例句

1.With a sliding-scale royalty, new artists can benefit from higher rates as their popularity grows.

通过分级版税，新艺术家可以随着人气的增长而受益于更高的费率。

2.The record label proposed a sliding-scale royalty system that adjusts payments based on the number of streams.

唱片公司提出了一种分级版税系统，根据流媒体播放次数调整支付。

3.The software company implemented a sliding-scale royalty for developers who create plugins based on user downloads.

软件公司为根据用户下载量创建插件的开发者实施了分级版税。

4.The artist agreed to a sliding-scale royalty arrangement, which means they will earn more as the sales increase.

艺术家同意了一个分级版税安排，这意味着他们的收入会随着销售的增加而增加。

5.In the publishing industry, many authors prefer a sliding-scale royalty model to ensure they are compensated fairly based on book sales.

在出版行业，许多作者更喜欢分级版税模型，以确保他们根据书籍销售获得公平的报酬。

作文

In the world of intellectual property, particularly in the fields of music, literature, and technology, the concept of a sliding-scale royalty is increasingly gaining attention. This term refers to a system of compensation where the amount paid to the creator or owner of a work varies based on certain conditions, such as the level of sales, usage, or profitability of the work. The idea behind this model is to create a fairer and more flexible way of rewarding creators, especially in industries where revenue can fluctuate significantly.For instance, consider a musician who releases a new album. Under a traditional royalty agreement, the artist might receive a fixed percentage of sales, regardless of how well the album performs. However, with a sliding-scale royalty arrangement, the percentage could increase if the album exceeds a certain number of sales, thus providing an incentive for the artist to promote their work more vigorously. This approach not only motivates artists but also aligns their interests with those of record labels and distributors, creating a more collaborative environment.Moreover, the sliding-scale royalty model can be beneficial in the realm of digital content. As streaming services dominate the music industry, artists are often compensated based on the number of streams their songs receive. A sliding scale can be applied here, where the payout per stream increases as the total number of streams rises. This method acknowledges the variance in popularity and ensures that artists who achieve greater success are rewarded accordingly.Additionally, the concept of sliding-scale royalty extends beyond the arts into technology and software licensing. For example, a software developer might license their product to a company with a royalty structure that adjusts based on the company's revenue generated from using the software. If the company sees significant growth due to the software, the royalties paid to the developer will increase, reflecting the value that the software brings to the business.However, implementing a sliding-scale royalty system is not without its challenges. It requires careful negotiation and clear communication between parties to establish the parameters that dictate how the scale operates. There must be mutual agreement on metrics such as sales thresholds or usage levels, and both parties need to be transparent about their financial reporting to ensure that the royalties are calculated fairly.Furthermore, there is always the risk of ambiguity in defining the terms of the sliding scale, which can lead to disputes down the line. If the conditions are not clearly outlined, one party may feel shortchanged or misled, potentially damaging relationships and reputations in the industry.In conclusion, the sliding-scale royalty model presents a modern approach to compensating creators in various fields, adapting to the changing landscapes of music, literature, and technology. By aligning the interests of creators and distributors, it fosters a more equitable system that rewards success and encourages innovation. However, for it to be effective, it requires clear agreements and transparency between all parties involved. As industries continue to evolve, the adoption of such flexible compensation structures may become increasingly commonplace, ensuring that creators receive fair remuneration for their contributions while also incentivizing them to reach new heights in their work.

在知识产权的世界中，尤其是在音乐、文学和技术领域，滑动比例版税的概念越来越受到关注。这个术语指的是一种补偿系统，其中支付给作品创作者或拥有者的金额根据某些条件（例如销售水平、使用情况或作品的盈利能力）而有所不同。这种模式背后的理念是创造一种更公平和灵活的方式来奖励创作者，特别是在收入可能显著波动的行业中。例如，考虑一位发布新专辑的音乐家。在传统的版税协议下，艺术家可能会获得固定百分比的销售额，无论专辑表现如何。然而，在滑动比例版税安排下，如果专辑超过一定销售数量，百分比可能会增加，从而为艺术家提供更大的动力来更积极地推广他们的作品。这种方法不仅激励了艺术家，还使他们的利益与唱片公司和发行商的利益保持一致，创造了一个更具合作性的环境。此外，滑动比例版税模型在数字内容领域也具有优势。随着流媒体服务主导音乐产业，艺术家的报酬通常基于他们的歌曲被收听的次数。在这里，可以应用滑动比例，当总收听次数增加时，每次播放的支付金额也会增加。这种方法承认了受欢迎程度的差异，并确保那些取得更大成功的艺术家得到相应的奖励。此外，滑动比例版税的概念不仅限于艺术领域，还扩展到技术和软件许可。例如，软件开发人员可能会向公司授权其产品，并采用一种根据公司从使用该软件中获得的收入调整的版税结构。如果公司由于该软件而实现显著增长，则支付给开发人员的版税将增加，反映出该软件为企业带来的价值。然而，实施滑动比例版税系统并非没有挑战。它需要各方之间进行仔细的谈判和明确的沟通，以建立决定滑动比例运作的参数。必须对销售门槛或使用水平等指标达成共同协议，双方还需要对其财务报告保持透明，以确保版税的计算是公平的。此外，定义滑动比例条款时总是存在模糊的风险，这可能导致后续争议。如果条件没有清晰列出，一方可能会感到受到亏待或误导，从而可能损害行业内的关系和声誉。总之，滑动比例版税模型为各种领域的创作者提供了一种现代的补偿方法，适应了音乐、文学和技术的变化格局。通过将创作者和发行方的利益保持一致，它促进了一种更公平的系统，奖励成功并鼓励创新。然而，为了使其有效，需要各方之间达成明确的协议和透明度。随着各行业的不断发展，这种灵活的补偿结构的采用可能会变得越来越普遍，确保创作者因其贡献获得公平的报酬，同时也激励他们在工作中达到新的高度。