premised

简明释义

英[ˈpremɪst]美[ˈpremɪst]

adj. 前提的

v. 提出前提；预述条件（premise 的过去式）

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Premised on assurance of speech quality, digital speech coding can reduce rate of bits, for the purpose of increasing use of finite bandwidth.

数字语音压缩的目的是在保证语音一定质量的前提下尽可能降低其编码比特率，提高有限传输带宽的利用率。

2.All our activities are premised on the basis of "quality with Equality".

我们所有活动都是以“优质、平等”为前提的。

3.Family is the basic unit of society and the peace and prosperity of a society are premised on the family harmony.

家庭，是构成社会的基本细胞，家庭的和睦安康是社会稳定昌盛的前提条件。

4.Traditional methods for getting rid of background noise from image are all premised on: objects are obviously different from background and objects have smooth surface.

传统的去除图像中背景噪声的方法都是以物体和背景有明显的差别、物体表面光滑为前提的。

5.This new downtown district, premised on a traditional town center design, will be connected throughout with pedestrian - and bike-friendly paths, which will also serve neighboring areas.

这个新的市中心区是基于传统城镇中心的设计，使步行和自行车的路径变得友好安全。

6.Traditional economic analysis is premised on the assumption that more is better.

传统的经济分析是以多多益善的设想为依据的。

7.Real rights and to recognize the property rights theory premised on the theory of conduct, behavior and claims about the behavior of property relations theory.

物权行为无因性理论以承认物权行为的理论为前提，是关于物权行为与债权行为关系的理论。

8.The larger question is whether any energy base designed for industrial society and premised on these Second Wave principles can survive.

更大问题是，任何为工业社会设计，并以第二次浪潮原则为前提能源基础，是否能够得到拯救？

9.All our activities are premised on the basis of "Quality with Equality."

我们所有活动都是以“优质、平等”为基本前提的。

10.The study's conclusions are premised 以...为前提 on extensive research.

该研究的结论是以...为前提 基于广泛的研究。

11.His argument is premised 以...为前提 on the belief that technology improves education.

他的论点以...为前提 是相信技术能够改善教育。

12.Her proposal was premised 以...为前提 on the assumption that funding would be available.

她的提案是以...为前提 假设资金将会到位。

13.The argument is based on a theory that is premised 以...为前提 on the idea of free will.

这个论点基于一个理论，以...为前提 是自由意志的概念。

14.The policy changes are premised 以...为前提 on the need for environmental sustainability.

政策变更以...为前提 是基于对环境可持续性的需求。

作文

In the realm of academic discourse, it is essential to construct arguments that are not only compelling but also logically sound. One of the fundamental aspects of this construction is the idea of being premised on solid evidence and reasoning. When we say that an argument is premised on certain facts, we imply that these facts serve as the foundation upon which the argument is built. This concept is vital in various fields, including philosophy, science, and social studies, where the validity of claims often hinges on their underlying assumptions.For instance, consider a research paper that discusses climate change. If the author asserts that human activities are contributing to global warming, this assertion must be premised on empirical data, such as temperature records and carbon dioxide levels. Without this foundational evidence, the argument risks falling into the realm of speculation rather than grounded analysis. Thus, the strength of any claim regarding climate change relies heavily on the quality and reliability of the data that premises it.Moreover, the importance of being premised on credible sources cannot be overstated. In an age where misinformation can spread rapidly, distinguishing between well-founded arguments and those lacking a solid basis is crucial. For example, if a political argument is premised on misleading statistics or biased interpretations of data, the conclusions drawn from such an argument may lead to misguided policies and decisions. Hence, critical thinking and skepticism are essential tools for evaluating the premises of any argument.In addition to being premised on factual evidence, arguments must also be premised on logical consistency. This means that the conclusions drawn should logically follow from the premises established. A classic example of this is found in deductive reasoning, where a conclusion is derived from two or more premises. If one of the premises is false or flawed, the conclusion may also be invalid. Therefore, ensuring that our arguments are premised on sound logic is vital for effective communication and persuasion.Furthermore, the concept of being premised extends beyond individual arguments to encompass entire theories and ideologies. For instance, many philosophical theories are premised on fundamental beliefs about human nature, morality, or existence. These foundational beliefs shape the way we interpret the world around us and influence our actions and decisions. Understanding the premises of these theories allows us to engage with them critically and assess their implications for our lives.In conclusion, the notion of being premised on solid evidence, logical consistency, and credible sources is paramount in constructing persuasive arguments. Whether in academic writing, public discourse, or everyday conversations, recognizing the importance of premises helps us navigate complex issues and make informed decisions. By ensuring that our arguments are premised on reliable foundations, we contribute to a more informed and rational dialogue within society. As we continue to engage with various ideas and perspectives, let us strive to uphold the integrity of our arguments by critically examining the premises upon which they stand.

在学术话语的领域中，构建不仅引人注目而且逻辑上合理的论点是至关重要的。这一构建的基本方面之一就是以坚实的证据和推理为基础的思想。当我们说一个论点是以某些事实为基础时，我们暗示这些事实作为论点构建的基础。这一概念在哲学、科学和社会研究等多个领域中至关重要，因为主张的有效性往往取决于其潜在假设。例如，考虑一篇讨论气候变化的研究论文。如果作者断言人类活动正在导致全球变暖，这一断言必须以经验数据为基础，如温度记录和二氧化碳水平。如果没有这一基础证据，论点就有可能陷入猜测的领域，而不是基于分析。因此，关于气候变化的任何主张的强度在很大程度上依赖于支撑它的证据的质量和可靠性。此外，基于可信来源的重要性不可低估。在一个错误信息可以迅速传播的时代，区分有坚实基础的论点和缺乏基础的论点至关重要。例如，如果一个政治论点是以误导性统计数据或偏见的数据解释为基础的，那么从这样的论点得出的结论可能会导致误导性的政策和决策。因此，批判性思维和怀疑主义是评估任何论点的前提的重要工具。除了基于事实证据外，论点还必须是逻辑一致的。这意味着得出的结论应当逻辑上跟所建立的前提相符。一个经典的例子存在于演绎推理中，其中一个结论是从两个或多个前提中得出的。如果其中一个前提是错误的或有缺陷的，那么结论也可能是无效的。因此，确保我们的论点是以可靠的逻辑为基础是有效沟通和说服的关键。此外，基于的概念超越了个别论点，涵盖了整个理论和意识形态。例如，许多哲学理论是基于关于人性、道德或存在的基本信念。这些基础信念塑造了我们对周围世界的解读方式，并影响我们的行为和决策。理解这些理论的前提使我们能够批判性地参与其中，评估它们对我们生活的影响。总之，基于坚实证据、逻辑一致性和可信来源的概念在构建有说服力的论点中至关重要。无论是在学术写作、公共话语还是日常交流中，认识到前提的重要性帮助我们驾驭复杂问题并做出明智的决策。通过确保我们的论点是基于可靠的基础，我们为社会内更为知情和理性的对话做出了贡献。当我们继续与各种观点和想法互动时，让我们努力通过批判性地审视我们论点所依赖的前提来维护论点的完整性。