legalistically

简明释义

英[ˌliːɡəˈlɪstɪkli]美[ˌliːɡəˈlɪstɪkli]

信奉律法者

律法主义者

墨守成规

文牍主义

法律术语

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.Life organized legalistically has thus shown its inability to defend itself against the corrosion of evil.

条文主义式的生活已显出对抗恶的侵蚀时的无力。

2.Life organized legalistically has thus shown its inability to defend itself against the corrosion of evil.

条文主义式的生活已显出对抗恶的侵蚀时的无力。

3.The committee's decision was made legalistically, adhering strictly to the rules without considering the context.

委员会的决定是以法律主义的方式做出的，严格遵循规则而不考虑背景。

4.When interpreting the contract, she did so legalistically, missing the broader intent behind the agreement.

在解读合同时，她以法律主义的方式进行，错过了协议背后的更广泛意图。

5.He criticized the judge for ruling legalistically rather than taking into account the unique circumstances of the case.

他批评法官的裁决是法律主义的，没有考虑案件的独特情况。

6.The policy was implemented legalistically, leading to unintended consequences for the community.

该政策以法律主义的方式实施，导致社区出现意想不到的后果。

7.The lawyer approached the case legalistically, focusing only on the letter of the law.

律师以法律主义的方式处理案件，仅关注法律的字面意义。

作文

In our modern society, the concept of law plays a crucial role in maintaining order and justice. However, there are times when individuals or institutions interpret laws in a way that is overly rigid or strict, often missing the underlying principles of fairness and morality. This phenomenon can be described as interpreting laws legalistically, which means adhering to the letter of the law rather than its spirit. Such an approach can lead to unjust outcomes, as it overlooks the broader context and the intent behind the legislation.For instance, consider a situation where a person is fined for a minor offense, such as parking in a restricted area for just a few minutes. If the authorities apply the law legalistically, they may impose the maximum penalty without considering the circumstances that led to the violation. Perhaps the driver was rushing to help someone in need or had a medical emergency. By focusing solely on the strict application of the law, the authorities risk alienating the public and fostering resentment towards the legal system.Moreover, interpreting laws legalistically can create a culture of fear among citizens, who may feel that any minor mistake could lead to severe consequences. This can discourage people from engaging in activities that require a certain level of flexibility or discretion. For example, teachers might hesitate to give students a second chance after a mistake, fearing that they would be violating school policies if they do not follow the rules exactly as written. In this way, a legalistically rigid interpretation of rules can stifle creativity, compassion, and understanding.On the other hand, when laws are applied with a sense of justice and humanity, they can serve their intended purpose of promoting social order while also allowing for individual circumstances to be considered. Judges and law enforcement officers who exercise discretion in their decision-making can often achieve outcomes that are more equitable and just. By moving away from a purely legalistically driven approach, they can better serve the community and uphold the values that the law is meant to protect.In conclusion, while it is essential to have laws in place to govern society, it is equally important to recognize that these laws should not be interpreted legalistically. A more balanced approach that considers the spirit of the law, as well as the specific circumstances of each case, can lead to a more just and compassionate society. It is imperative that we strive for a legal system that embodies not only the rules but also the values of empathy, fairness, and understanding, ensuring that justice is truly served for all individuals.

在我们现代社会中，法律的概念在维护秩序和公正方面发挥着至关重要的作用。然而，有时个人或机构会以过于严格或死板的方式解释法律，常常忽视公平和道德的基本原则。这种现象可以被描述为以legalistically（法律主义地）解读法律，这意味着遵循法律的字面意义而不是其精神。这种方法可能导致不公正的结果，因为它忽视了更广泛的背景和立法背后的意图。例如，考虑一种情况，一个人因轻微违法行为而被罚款，比如仅仅在限制区域停车几分钟。如果当局以legalistically（法律主义地）执行法律，他们可能会在没有考虑导致违规的情况的情况下施加最高罚款。也许司机是急着去帮助需要帮助的人，或者遇到了医疗紧急情况。通过仅仅关注法律的严格执行，当局冒着疏远公众和引发对法律制度的不满的风险。此外，以legalistically（法律主义地）解释法律可能会在公民中创造一种恐惧文化，他们可能会觉得任何小错误都可能导致严重后果。这可能会阻止人们参与需要一定灵活性或自由裁量权的活动。例如，教师可能会犹豫是否给学生一个改正错误的机会，担心如果不完全遵循书面规则，就会违反学校政策。以这种方式，过于legalistically（法律主义地）严格解释规则可能会扼杀创造力、同情心和理解。另一方面，当法律以正义和人性的视角来应用时，它们可以实现促进社会秩序的预期目的，同时也允许考虑个别情况。那些在决策过程中行使自由裁量权的法官和执法人员通常能够实现更公平和公正的结果。通过摆脱纯粹以legalistically（法律主义地）驱动的方法，他们可以更好地服务于社区，并维护法律所旨在保护的价值观。总之，虽然制定法律以管理社会是至关重要的，但同样重要的是要认识到这些法律不应以legalistically（法律主义地）方式进行解释。更平衡的方法，既考虑法律的精神，又考虑每个案件的具体情况，可以导致一个更加公正和富有同情心的社会。我们必须努力争取一个不仅体现规则而且体现同情、公平和理解价值观的法律系统，确保每个人都能真正获得公正。