kingless

简明释义

英[ˈkɪŋləs]美[ˈkɪŋləs]

adj. 无君主的；无国王的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.A three-year kingless period was possibly the result of a succession crisis.

三年无国王期可能是继承危机所造成的的结果。

2.A three-year kingless period was possibly the result of a succession crisis.

三年无国王期可能是继承危机所造成的的结果。

3.After the revolution, the country became kingless, leading to a new form of government.

革命后，这个国家变得无王，导致了一种新的政府形式。

4.Living in a kingless world challenged the characters to find new leaders.

生活在一个无王的世界中，挑战角色们寻找新的领导者。

5.His novel depicts a kingless society where tradition is replaced by innovation.

他的小说描绘了一个无王的社会，传统被创新所取代。

6.In a kingless realm, the citizens took charge of their own destiny.

在一个无王的王国里，公民们掌握了自己的命运。

7.The story unfolds in a kingless land where power is shared among the people.

这个故事发生在一个无王的土地上，权力由人民共同分享。

作文

In a world that often reveres authority and leadership, the concept of being kingless can evoke a sense of both freedom and uncertainty. The term kingless refers to a state or condition where there is no king or sovereign ruler, symbolizing a lack of centralized power. This idea can be explored through various lenses, including political systems, personal autonomy, and societal structures.Historically, many societies have thrived under monarchies, where a single ruler held the reins of power. However, the notion of a kingless society can be appealing, especially in the context of democratic ideals. In such societies, power is distributed among the people, allowing for a more equitable representation of diverse voices. The absence of a king can lead to a greater emphasis on collaboration and collective decision-making, fostering a sense of community and shared responsibility.From a political perspective, a kingless society challenges traditional hierarchies. It raises questions about governance and the role of leaders. Without a king to dictate policies, citizens must engage in dialogue and debate to reach consensus on important issues. This participatory approach can empower individuals, encouraging them to take ownership of their governance and actively contribute to the shaping of their community.On a personal level, being kingless can symbolize liberation from oppressive structures. Individuals may feel more empowered to express their opinions and pursue their passions without the constraints imposed by a singular authority figure. This sense of autonomy can lead to greater creativity and innovation, as people explore new ideas and challenge the status quo.However, the absence of a king also brings challenges. A kingless society may struggle with decision-making, as the lack of a clear leader can result in confusion and conflict. Without a central authority to provide direction, individuals may find it difficult to navigate complex issues. Additionally, the responsibility of governance can be overwhelming, leading to potential chaos if not managed effectively.Moreover, the concept of being kingless can extend beyond political realms into social constructs. In relationships, for instance, the idea of a kingless dynamic can encourage equality among partners. When both individuals share power and make decisions collaboratively, it can lead to healthier and more fulfilling connections. This shift away from traditional roles allows for mutual respect and understanding, fostering an environment where both partners can thrive.In literature and art, the theme of a kingless world often serves as a backdrop for exploring human nature. Works that depict societies without rulers can delve into the complexities of morality, ethics, and the human condition. These narratives challenge readers to consider what happens when authority is stripped away and individuals are left to govern themselves.In conclusion, the concept of being kingless offers a rich tapestry of possibilities and challenges. While it can signify freedom and empowerment, it also prompts critical reflections on governance, responsibility, and human relationships. As we navigate our own lives, embracing the idea of a kingless existence might inspire us to seek balance between autonomy and cooperation, ultimately shaping a more inclusive and dynamic society.

在一个常常崇尚权威和领导力的世界里，“kingless”的概念可以引发一种自由与不确定感。这个词“kingless”指的是没有国王或主权统治者的状态或条件，象征着缺乏集中权力。这一思想可以通过政治体系、个人自主权和社会结构等多个视角进行探讨。历史上，许多社会在君主制下繁荣发展，单一的统治者掌握着权力的缰绳。然而，“kingless”社会的概念可能令人向往，尤其是在民主理想的背景下。在这样的社会中，权力在人民之间分配，允许更公平地代表多样化的声音。没有国王的存在可以导致更加强调合作和集体决策，培养社区意识和共同责任感。从政治角度看，“kingless”社会挑战了传统的等级制度。它提出了关于治理和领导者角色的问题。没有国王来决定政策，公民必须参与对话和辩论，以达成对重要问题的共识。这种参与式的方法可以赋予个人权力，鼓励他们对自己的治理负责，并积极参与塑造自己的社区。在个人层面上，成为“kingless”象征着摆脱压迫性结构的解放。个人可能会感到更有能力表达自己的意见，追求自己的激情，而不受单一权威人物施加的限制。这种自主感可以带来更大的创造力和创新，因为人们探索新思想并挑战现状。然而，缺乏国王也带来了挑战。“kingless”社会可能在决策方面面临困难，因为缺乏明确的领导者可能导致混乱和冲突。没有中央权威提供方向，个人可能会发现很难应对复杂问题。此外，治理的责任可能是压倒性的，如果管理不当，可能会导致潜在的混乱。此外，“kingless”的概念可以超越政治领域进入社会构造。例如，在关系中，“kingless”动态的理念可以鼓励伴侣之间的平等。当双方分享权力并共同做出决策时，可以导致更健康、更充实的联系。这种对传统角色的转变允许相互尊重和理解，培养一个双方都能蓬勃发展的环境。在文学和艺术中，一个“kingless”世界的主题常常作为探索人性的背景。描绘没有统治者的社会的作品可以深入探讨道德、伦理和人类状况的复杂性。这些叙述挑战读者思考当权威被剥夺时发生了什么，以及个体如何自我治理。总之，“kingless”的概念提供了丰富的可能性和挑战。虽然它可以象征自由和赋权，但也促使我们对治理、责任和人际关系进行深刻反思。在我们自己的生活中，拥抱“kingless”存在的理念可能会激励我们在自主与合作之间寻求平衡，最终塑造一个更具包容性和活力的社会。