tinpot

简明释义

英[ˈtɪnpɒt]美[ˈtɪnpɑːt]

adj. （非正式）（尤指国家或其领导者）无能的

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.I'm just a tinpot manager.

我只是个小小的经理。

2.The position of crude oil's output was analyzed in the article, and the direction of the tinpot oil's process was put forward.

本文主要分析了我国原油产量的形势，并提出劣质重油加工的方向。

3.The position of crude oil's output was analyzed in the article, and the direction of the tinpot oil's process was put forward.

本文主要分析了我国原油产量的形势，并提出劣质重油加工的方向。

4.I "m just a tinpot manager."

我只是个小小的经理。

5.The tinpot 微不足道的 organization struggled to make an impact in the industry.

这个tinpot 微不足道的组织在行业中难以产生影响。

6.His tinpot 微不足道的 attempts to gain respect were laughable.

他那种tinpot 微不足道的尝试赢得尊重的行为真是可笑。

7.The dictator was nothing more than a tinpot 小国的 ruler, lacking any real power or influence.

这个独裁者不过是一个tinpot 小国的统治者，缺乏任何真正的权力或影响。

8.They dismissed his ideas as tinpot 不切实际的 and unworthy of consideration.

他们将他的想法视为tinpot 不切实际的，不值得考虑。

9.The company was run by a tinpot 无能的 manager who made poor decisions.

这家公司由一位tinpot 无能的经理管理，他做出的决定都很糟糕。

作文

In today's world, we often encounter various types of leaders and governments, ranging from the highly respected to the utterly ridiculous. One term that has gained traction in political discourse is tinpot, which refers to a leader or regime that is considered insignificant, incompetent, or lacking in legitimacy. The use of this term highlights the disdain many people feel towards certain political figures who wield power without the necessary qualifications or respect from their constituents. tinpot leaders often emerge in contexts where democratic processes are weak or non-existent, leading to a governance style that prioritizes personal gain over public service.The term itself originates from the idea of cheap, low-quality tin products that are easily manufactured but lack durability and value. Similarly, tinpot leaders may appear to hold authority, but their governance is flimsy and ultimately ineffective. This analogy serves to emphasize the superficiality of their power and the lack of substance behind their decisions. For instance, a tinpot dictator might rule through fear and oppression, but their grip on power is tenuous at best, as they fail to address the needs and concerns of their people.A prime example of a tinpot regime can be seen in some small nations where leaders have declared themselves as presidents for life, often utilizing military force to suppress dissent and maintain control. Such leaders may indulge in grandiose displays of power, such as parades and state-sponsored celebrations, yet their inability to provide for their citizens' basic needs reveals their true nature. The disconnect between their self-perception and reality is what makes them tinpot figures in the eyes of the international community.Moreover, the rise of social media has made it easier for people to identify and criticize tinpot leaders. Citizens can now share their experiences and opinions on platforms that were previously inaccessible, allowing for a more significant pushback against authoritarianism. This democratization of information empowers individuals to challenge the narratives constructed by tinpot regimes, often leading to greater awareness and mobilization against oppressive governance.It is essential to recognize that the impact of tinpot leadership extends beyond national borders. When such leaders are allowed to thrive, they can destabilize entire regions, fostering conflict and humanitarian crises. The international community must remain vigilant and proactive in addressing the rise of tinpot regimes, as their actions can have far-reaching consequences.In conclusion, the term tinpot serves as a critical reminder of the importance of competent and legitimate leadership. It underscores the need for accountability and transparency in governance, as well as the necessity for citizens to remain engaged and informed. By understanding the implications of tinpot leadership, we can better appreciate the value of strong institutions and the role they play in safeguarding democracy and human rights. As we move forward, it is crucial to support efforts that promote genuine leadership, ensuring that those in power are truly representative of and accountable to the people they serve.

在当今世界，我们经常遇到各种类型的领导者和政府，从备受尊敬到完全荒谬。一个在政治话语中逐渐流行的术语是tinpot，它指的是被认为微不足道、无能或缺乏合法性的领导者或政权。这个术语的使用突显了许多人对某些政治人物的蔑视，这些人物在没有必要资格或来自选民的尊重的情况下掌握权力。tinpot领导者往往出现在民主过程薄弱或不存在的背景下，导致一种优先考虑个人利益而非公共服务的治理风格。这个术语本身源于廉价、低质量的锡制品的概念，这些产品易于制造，但缺乏耐用性和价值。同样，tinpot领导者可能看似拥有权威，但他们的治理是脆弱的，最终是无效的。这种类比强调了他们权力的表面性以及其决策背后缺乏实质内容。例如，一个tinpot独裁者可能通过恐惧和压迫来统治，但他们对权力的控制在最好情况下也是脆弱的，因为他们未能解决人民的需求和关切。一个典型的tinpot政权的例子可以在一些小国中看到，那里的领导人自称为终身总统，通常利用军事力量压制异议并维持控制。这些领导者可能沉迷于权力的宏伟展示，如阅兵和国家赞助的庆祝活动，但他们无法满足公民的基本需求，揭示了他们的真实本质。他们的自我认知与现实之间的脱节，使他们在国际社会眼中成为tinpot人物。此外，社交媒体的兴起使得人们更容易识别和批评tinpot领导者。公民现在可以在以前无法接触的平台上分享他们的经历和看法，从而对专制主义进行更大的反击。这种信息的民主化使个体能够挑战tinpot政权构建的叙事，通常导致更大的意识和动员反对压迫性治理。必须认识到，tinpot领导的影响超越国界。当这样的领导者被允许滋生时，他们可能会破坏整个地区，助长冲突和人道主义危机。国际社会必须保持警惕，并积极应对tinpot政权的崛起，因为他们的行为可能产生深远的后果。总之，tinpot这个术语作为对有能力和合法的领导的重要提醒。它强调了治理中的问责制和透明度的必要性，以及公民保持参与和知情的必要性。通过理解tinpot领导的影响，我们可以更好地欣赏强大机构的价值及其在保障民主和人权方面所发挥的作用。随着我们向前推进，支持促进真正领导力的努力至关重要，以确保掌权者真正代表和对他们所服务的人民负责。