bottom cutting

简明释义

底部截槽

英英释义

例句

1.In the woodworking class, we learned about bottom cutting to achieve cleaner edges on our projects.

在木工课上，我们学习了如何通过底切来使我们的项目边缘更整洁。

2.The fisherman noticed that the technique of bottom cutting was effective in catching larger fish.

渔夫注意到底切的技巧在捕捉更大鱼类时非常有效。

3.The construction team had to perform bottom cutting to fit the new foundation properly.

施工队必须进行底切以正确安装新基础。

4.The chef demonstrated bottom cutting techniques to prepare vegetables efficiently.

厨师演示了如何高效准备蔬菜的底切技巧。

5.During the landscaping project, they used bottom cutting to create a more aesthetically pleasing garden layout.

在园艺项目中，他们使用底切来创建更美观的花园布局。

作文

In the realm of business and finance, terms often carry significant weight and implications. One such term that has gained traction in recent discussions is bottom cutting. This phrase refers to the practice of reducing costs or prices to the lowest possible level, often with the intent to gain a competitive advantage or to clear out inventory. While this strategy can lead to short-term benefits, it raises questions about long-term sustainability and ethical practices within industries. 底部削减在商业和金融领域，常常意味着通过降低成本或价格来获得竞争优势，或者清理库存。虽然这种策略可能会带来短期利益，但它也引发了关于行业内长期可持续性和伦理实践的问题。To understand the implications of bottom cutting, we must first examine its impact on various stakeholders. For businesses, implementing a bottom cutting strategy can initially attract customers looking for bargains. However, if a company consistently prioritizes low prices over quality, it risks damaging its brand reputation. Customers may come to associate the brand with inferior products or services, leading to a decline in customer loyalty. Furthermore, this approach can create a price war among competitors, ultimately eroding profit margins across the industry.From the perspective of employees, bottom cutting can also have detrimental effects. When companies focus on slashing costs, they may resort to layoffs or wage reductions to maintain profitability. This not only affects the livelihoods of workers but can also lead to decreased morale and productivity within the workforce. Employees who feel undervalued or insecure about their jobs are less likely to contribute positively to the company's success.Moreover, the environmental implications of bottom cutting cannot be overlooked. In an effort to cut costs, companies may opt for cheaper materials or processes that are harmful to the environment. This can lead to increased waste and pollution, further exacerbating the global environmental crisis. Sustainable practices often require an upfront investment, which may be overlooked in favor of immediate financial gains through bottom cutting.On the consumer side, while bottom cutting might seem beneficial at first glance, it can lead to a cycle of dissatisfaction. Consumers may find themselves purchasing low-quality products that do not meet their needs, resulting in wasted money and resources. Additionally, the constant push for lower prices can desensitize consumers to the true value of products and services, making it difficult for them to appreciate quality when it is presented.In conclusion, while the tactic of bottom cutting may offer short-term advantages, it poses significant risks to businesses, employees, the environment, and consumers alike. Companies must weigh the immediate benefits against the potential long-term consequences of such a strategy. A more balanced approach, focusing on sustainable practices and quality, may ultimately lead to greater success in the competitive marketplace. Emphasizing value rather than merely low prices could foster a healthier economy and society, where all stakeholders benefit in the long run. Thus, understanding the full implications of bottom cutting is crucial for anyone involved in the business world today.

在商业和金融领域，术语往往具有重要的意义和影响力。近年来，底部削减这一术语逐渐受到关注。这个短语指的是将成本或价格降低到最低水平的做法，通常是为了获得竞争优势或清理库存。虽然这种策略可以带来短期利益，但它也引发了关于行业内长期可持续性和伦理实践的问题。要理解底部削减的影响，我们首先必须考察其对各利益相关者的影响。对于企业来说，实施底部削减策略最初可能会吸引那些寻找便宜货的顾客。然而，如果一家公司始终优先考虑低价而非质量，它就有可能损害品牌声誉。顾客可能会将该品牌与劣质产品或服务联系在一起，导致顾客忠诚度下降。此外，这种做法可能在竞争对手之间引发价格战，最终侵蚀整个行业的利润率。从员工的角度来看，底部削减也可能产生负面影响。当公司专注于削减成本时，它们可能会通过裁员或降低工资来维持盈利能力。这不仅影响工人的生计，还可能导致员工的士气和生产力下降。感到被低估或对工作不安全的员工不太可能积极为公司的成功做出贡献。此外，底部削减的环境影响也不容忽视。为了降低成本，公司可能会选择更便宜或对环境有害的材料或工艺。这可能导致废物和污染的增加，进一步加剧全球环境危机。可持续的做法通常需要前期投资，而这些可能在追求短期经济利益的过程中被忽视。从消费者的角度来看，尽管底部削减乍一看似乎是有利的，但它可能导致不满的循环。消费者可能发现自己购买了无法满足需求的低质量产品，导致金钱和资源的浪费。此外，持续的低价推动可能使消费者对产品和服务的真实价值麻木，从而使他们在面对高质量产品时难以欣赏。总之，尽管底部削减策略可能提供短期优势，但它对企业、员工、环境和消费者都构成了重大风险。公司必须权衡即时利益与此类策略可能带来的长期后果。更平衡的方法，专注于可持续实践和质量，最终可能在竞争激烈的市场中带来更大的成功。强调价值而不仅仅是低价，可能有助于培养一个更健康的经济和社会，让所有利益相关者在长期中受益。因此，理解底部削减的全部影响对当今商业世界的每个人来说都是至关重要的。