polemical
简明释义
adj. 好辩的；好争论的；挑起论战的
英英释义
Relating to or involving strongly critical or controversial writing or speech. | 与强烈批评或有争议的写作或演讲相关的。 |
单词用法
争论性辩论 | |
争论性文章 | |
争论性话语 | |
争论立场 | |
争论性作品 | |
争论性作家 |
同义词
反义词
例句
1.Of the numerous polemical works directed against the Jews, only a few can be mentioned here.
许多争论的作品针对犹太人的，只有少数几个可以在这里提及。
2.Daniels is at his best when he's cool and direct, rather than combative and polemical.
丹尼尔斯冷静、坦率时表现最好，而好斗、爱辩时则不然。
3.This article represents a broad and occasionally polemical meditation on the nature and significance of creative cities.
本文代表对创意城市的性质和重要性所进行的一种宽泛而偶然的辩证性思考。
4.Arguments cannot be solely polemical, but must derive from a clear, well-supported evaluation of the texts, lecture materials, videos or films.
论证不能仅仅是辩驳，必须建立对课文、讲课资料、录像或影片的清楚且论据充分的评价基础上。
5.Well there's lots of very good polemical literature, but what makes it live is not the argument that it makes but the way it makes it.
有很多不错的论战文学，但是给作品生命的并非其中的雄辩，而是作品的论战方式。
6.Now, an industrial accident—a gaseous explosion in the piping of the polemical Botnia plant in Fray Bento, Uruguay on February 27th—has fuelled the dispute anew.
现在，一场工业事故——2月27日，乌拉圭弗雷本多的一家好事工厂发生了管道气体引起的爆炸——再度生起争端。
7.It is a sparkling book, with little gems of polemical fire scattered through almost every page, ranging from bright wit to the hard glitter of logic to the quiet radiance of a profound understanding.
这是一本出色的作品，几乎每一页都流露着思想的火花，既有明亮的智慧，又有艰深的逻辑光辉，还有深刻理解散发出的宁静光芒。
8.In Ulf Meyer's previous article, "Architecture of a Thousand Pinpricks," the tone was deliberately polemical.
梅尔在他的文章《一千点的建筑》中故意使用了挑衅的语气。
9.The author's latest book is highly 争论性的, sparking debates among critics.
这位作者的最新书籍具有高度的争论性，引发了评论家的辩论。
10.The film takes a 争论性 approach to the topic of immigration.
这部电影在移民话题上采取了争论性的方式。
11.His 争论性 comments during the debate led to an uproar among the audience.
他在辩论中的争论性言论引发了观众的哗然。
12.Her 争论性 stance on climate change has made her a controversial figure in the scientific community.
她在气候变化问题上的争论性立场使她成为科学界的一个有争议的人物。
13.The 争论性 article challenged long-held beliefs about economic policies.
这篇争论性文章挑战了长期以来对经济政策的信念。
作文
In the realm of literature and discourse, the term polemical refers to a style of writing or speaking that is contentious and argumentative, often aimed at refuting or criticizing opposing views. This kind of discourse is not merely about presenting facts; it is about engaging in a battle of ideas where the stakes are high, and the intention is to persuade or provoke. The use of polemical language can be seen in various forms of media, from opinion columns in newspapers to debates on social media platforms. One prominent example of polemical writing can be found in the works of famous authors like Jonathan Swift and George Orwell. Swift's "A Modest Proposal" is a satirical piece that uses polemical techniques to address the dire situation of poverty in Ireland. By suggesting that the impoverished Irish could sell their children as food to the rich, Swift employs shock value to criticize British policy and societal indifference towards the suffering of the Irish people. The polemical nature of this work lies not only in its outrageous suggestion but also in its underlying message about the exploitation and neglect faced by the Irish. Similarly, George Orwell's writings often contain a polemical edge, particularly in his critiques of totalitarianism and political corruption. In "Animal Farm," Orwell uses allegory to highlight the flaws of Soviet communism, employing a polemical tone to underscore the betrayal of revolutionary ideals. Through the characters and events in the story, Orwell crafts a narrative that challenges readers to reflect critically on authority and power dynamics. The polemical approach here serves to engage the audience emotionally and intellectually, prompting them to question the status quo. In contemporary discussions, polemical arguments often arise in debates over social issues such as climate change, immigration, and healthcare. Activists and commentators frequently adopt a polemical stance to advocate for their causes, using passionate rhetoric to rally support and challenge opposition. For instance, environmental activists may write polemical articles that criticize government inaction on climate issues, aiming to mobilize public opinion and pressure policymakers. This style of writing is effective in drawing attention to urgent matters, but it can also polarize audiences and stifle constructive dialogue. While polemical discourse can be a powerful tool for advocacy and change, it is essential to recognize its potential downsides. The intensity of polemical arguments can lead to division and hostility, as opposing sides become entrenched in their positions. This is particularly evident in online discussions, where the anonymity of social media can amplify polemical exchanges, often resulting in toxic environments that discourage reasoned debate. In conclusion, understanding the concept of polemical discourse is crucial for anyone engaged in critical thinking and communication. While it can serve as a catalyst for important conversations and social change, it also requires a level of responsibility and awareness of its impact on public discourse. Striking a balance between passionate advocacy and respectful dialogue is key to fostering a more constructive exchange of ideas. As we navigate the complexities of modern communication, being mindful of our use of polemical language can help us engage more effectively with diverse perspectives and promote a healthier discourse overall.
在文学和话语领域，术语polemical指的是一种有争议和争论性的写作或演讲风格，通常旨在驳斥或批评对立观点。这种话语不仅仅是关于呈现事实；它是关于在思想的战斗中参与其中，赌注很高，目的是说服或挑衅。polemical语言的使用可以在各种媒体形式中看到，从报纸的评论专栏到社交媒体平台上的辩论。 一个著名的polemical写作例子可以在著名作者如乔纳森·斯威夫特和乔治·奥威尔的作品中找到。斯威夫特的《温和的提议》是一篇讽刺作品，使用polemical技巧来解决爱尔兰贫困的严峻情况。通过建议贫困的爱尔兰人可以把他们的孩子卖给富人作为食物，斯威夫特利用冲击价值来批评英国政策和社会对爱尔兰人民苦难的漠视。这部作品的polemical性质不仅在于其离谱的建议，还在于其关于爱尔兰人所面临的剥削和忽视的潜在信息。 同样，乔治·奥威尔的著作常常包含一种polemical的边缘，特别是在他对极权主义和政治腐败的批评中。在《动物农场》中，奥威尔使用寓言来突出苏联共产主义的缺陷，采用polemical的语气来强调革命理想的背叛。通过故事中的角色和事件，奥威尔构建了一个挑战读者批判性思考权威和权力动态的叙述。这种polemical的方法旨在情感和智力上吸引观众，促使他们质疑现状。 在当代讨论中，关于气候变化、移民和医疗保健等社会问题的辩论中，polemical论点经常出现。活动家和评论员常常采取polemical立场来倡导他们的事业，使用激情四溢的修辞来团结支持并挑战反对意见。例如，环保活动家可能会写polemical文章，批评政府在气候问题上的无作为，旨在动员公众舆论并施压政策制定者。这种写作风格在引起人们对紧迫问题的关注方面是有效的，但也可能使观众两极分化，抑制建设性的对话。 虽然polemical话语可以成为倡导和变革的强大工具，但认识到其潜在的负面影响也是至关重要的。polemical论点的强度可能导致分裂和敌意，因为对立双方在自己的立场上变得固执。这在网络讨论中尤为明显，在这种情况下，社交媒体的匿名性可能会放大polemical交流，往往导致有毒的环境，阻碍理性的辩论。 总之，理解polemical话语的概念对于任何参与批判性思考和沟通的人来说都是至关重要的。虽然它可以作为重要对话和社会变革的催化剂，但它也需要一定程度的责任感和对其对公共话语影响的意识。在热情倡导与尊重对话之间取得平衡是促进更具建设性的思想交流的关键。当我们在现代沟通的复杂性中航行时，关注我们使用的polemical语言可以帮助我们更有效地与不同的观点互动，并促进整体上更健康的话语。
