dubiety

简明释义

英[ˌdjuːˈbaɪəti]美[ˌduːˈbaɪəti]

n. 可疑的东西；可疑性

复 数 d u b i e t i e s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.But if diminutive of dubiety of coronary heart disease moves electrocardiogram test result is positive, the possibility with its electropositive holiday is larger.

但是冠心病可疑性小的人假如运动心电图试验结果阳性，其假阳性的可能性较大。

2.The most effective precautions against professional risks are to acquire and apply the concepts of professional prudence and dubiety to enhance the awareness of accountability.

牢固树立并全面实施职业谨慎和职业怀疑理念，加强受托责任意识，是防范职业风险的根本。

3.The most effective precautions against professional risks are to acquire and apply the concepts of professional prudence and dubiety to enhance the awareness of accountability.

牢固树立并全面实施职业谨慎和职业怀疑理念，加强受托责任意识，是防范职业风险的根本。

4.The scientist expressed his dubiety about the validity of the new research findings.

这位科学家对新研究结果的有效性表示了怀疑。

5.There was a sense of dubiety among the investors regarding the startup's business model.

投资者对这家初创公司的商业模式感到一阵怀疑。

6.Her dubiety about the politician's promises led her to vote for another candidate.

她对政治家承诺的怀疑使她投票给了另一位候选人。

7.Despite his confidence, there was a lingering dubiety in his mind about the outcome of the project.

尽管他很自信，但他心中对项目结果仍然有一丝怀疑。

8.The teacher noticed the students' dubiety when she introduced the complex topic.

老师注意到学生在介绍复杂主题时的怀疑。

作文

In today’s fast-paced world, we are constantly bombarded with information from various sources. This overwhelming influx of data can lead to a state of confusion and uncertainty, often resulting in feelings of dubiety (怀疑) regarding the validity of the information we receive. Whether it is news articles, social media posts, or even academic research, the need to discern truth from falsehood has never been more critical. One of the primary reasons for this dubiety (怀疑) is the prevalence of misinformation. In recent years, the rise of fake news has made it increasingly difficult for individuals to trust what they read. For instance, during major events such as elections or global crises, sensationalized headlines and misleading statistics can easily sway public opinion. This manipulation of information fosters a climate of skepticism, where people begin to question the motives behind the news being presented to them. Moreover, the sheer volume of information available can contribute to our dubiety (怀疑). With countless articles, blogs, and videos at our fingertips, it can be challenging to determine which sources are credible. Academic studies often require rigorous peer review processes, yet even these can be subject to biases or conflicts of interest. When faced with conflicting reports on the same topic, individuals may find themselves in a state of paralysis, unable to make informed decisions due to their lingering dubiety (怀疑). This situation is particularly evident in the realm of health and wellness. During the COVID-19 pandemic, for example, the public was inundated with information about the virus, treatment options, and vaccine efficacy. As new studies emerged, so did conflicting opinions from experts, leading to widespread dubiety (怀疑) about the best course of action. Some people hesitated to get vaccinated due to the constant barrage of contradictory messages, illustrating how dubiety (怀疑) can have real-world consequences. To combat this dubiety (怀疑), it is essential to develop critical thinking skills. Individuals must learn to evaluate sources, consider the evidence presented, and recognize potential biases. Engaging with multiple perspectives can also help mitigate feelings of uncertainty. By fostering an environment where questioning and discussion are encouraged, we can work towards building a more informed society. Additionally, media literacy programs play a vital role in addressing dubiety (怀疑). Educational initiatives that teach individuals how to assess the credibility of sources and identify misinformation can empower people to navigate the complex information landscape. Schools, community organizations, and online platforms should prioritize these programs to equip individuals with the tools necessary to discern fact from fiction. In conclusion, while dubiety (怀疑) is an inevitable response to the vast amount of information we encounter daily, it is crucial to approach this challenge with a proactive mindset. By cultivating critical thinking skills and promoting media literacy, we can reduce the impact of dubiety (怀疑) on our decision-making processes. In doing so, we can foster a culture of informed citizens who are better equipped to navigate the complexities of the modern world.

在当今快节奏的世界中，我们不断受到来自各种来源的信息轰炸。这种信息的过量涌入可能导致混乱和不确定感，常常使人们对我们所接收到的信息的有效性产生dubiety（怀疑）。无论是新闻文章、社交媒体帖子，还是学术研究，辨别真相与虚假信息的需求从未如此重要。 造成这种dubiety（怀疑）的主要原因之一是错误信息的普遍存在。近年来，假新闻的兴起使得个人越来越难以信任他们所阅读的内容。例如，在选举或全球危机等重大事件期间，耸人听闻的标题和误导性的统计数据很容易影响公众舆论。这种信息操控滋生了怀疑的气候，人们开始质疑所呈现新闻背后的动机。 此外，信息的庞大数量也会加剧我们的dubiety（怀疑）。面对数不胜数的文章、博客和视频，确定哪些来源是可信的可能会变得具有挑战性。学术研究往往需要严格的同行评审过程，但即使这些也可能受到偏见或利益冲突的影响。当面临同一主题的相互矛盾的报道时，个人可能会陷入瘫痪状态，由于持续的dubiety（怀疑）而无法做出明智的决策。 这种情况在健康和保健领域尤为明显。例如，在COVID-19大流行期间，公众被大量关于病毒、治疗选择和疫苗有效性的信息淹没。随着新研究的出现，专家们的相互矛盾的观点也随之而来，导致人们对最佳行动方案产生广泛的dubiety（怀疑）。一些人因对不断变化的矛盾信息感到犹豫而不愿接种疫苗，这说明了dubiety（怀疑）可能会带来现实世界的后果。 为了应对这种dubiety（怀疑），发展批判性思维技能至关重要。个人必须学习评估来源、考虑提出的证据并识别潜在的偏见。参与多种观点的讨论也有助于减轻不确定感。通过营造一个鼓励质疑和讨论的环境，我们可以朝着建立一个更有知识的社会努力。 此外，媒体素养项目在解决dubiety（怀疑）方面发挥着重要作用。教授个人如何评估来源的可信度和识别错误信息的教育计划，可以使人们能够驾驭复杂的信息环境。学校、社区组织和在线平台应优先考虑这些项目，以为个人提供必要的工具，从而辨别事实与虚构。 总之，尽管dubiety（怀疑）是我们每天遇到的大量信息的必然反应，但以积极的心态应对这一挑战至关重要。通过培养批判性思维技能和促进媒体素养，我们可以减少dubiety（怀疑）对我们决策过程的影响。这样，我们可以培养一个文化，使公民更好地装备自己，以应对现代世界的复杂性。