structuralist

简明释义

英[ˈstrʌktʃərəlɪst]美[ˈstrʌktʃərəlɪst]

n. 结构学派理论；构造主义者

adj. 结构语言学的；结构心理学的

复 数 s t r u c t u r a l i s t s

英英释义

单词用法

同义词

反义词

例句

1.From the perspective of the structuralist semiotics, the present paper aims to interpret the differences between the ox and the sheep in the story told in Mencius 1A7.

《孟子·梁惠王》所记载的一个故事中的牛与羊的区别，可以用结构主义符号学的方法来思考。

2.He used structuralist method in his analysis so readers can have a multi-dimensional perspective about the change of population and history.

结构主义的分析方法，为人们提供了一幅生动的立体的人口与历史关系的画卷；

3.There are two main structuralist techniques incorporated into critical social research.

批判性社会研究中融入了两种主要的结构主义分析技巧。

4.I don't think you can find much original work that is truly post-structuralist any more.

我认为你再也找不到很多真正是后结构主义的原创作品了。

5.This was primarily a semantic and structuralist approach to understanding how similar films convey meaning.

这首先是一种语义的和结构主义的批评方法，用来理解类似的电影如何传达意义。

6.Structuralist poetics has formed the theoretical background of literary competence.

结构主义诗学则是文学能力的理论背景。

7.Many structuralists argue that language is a system of signs that creates meaning.

许多结构主义者认为语言是一个创造意义的符号系统。

8.In anthropology, structuralist theories analyze cultural phenomena as part of larger systems.

在人类学中，结构主义理论将文化现象分析为更大系统的一部分。

9.A structuralist critique of capitalism reveals the hidden mechanisms that sustain it.

对资本主义的结构主义批评揭示了维持其运作的隐秘机制。

10.The structuralist perspective can be applied to various fields, including psychology and sociology.

结构主义视角可以应用于心理学和社会学等多个领域。

11.The structuralist approach in literature focuses on the underlying structures that shape narratives.

在文学中，结构主义者的方法关注于塑造叙事的潜在结构。

作文

In the realm of literary theory and cultural studies, the term structuralist refers to a critical approach that emphasizes the underlying structures that shape human culture, language, and thought. This perspective emerged in the mid-20th century, greatly influenced by the works of linguist Ferdinand de Saussure, who argued that language is a system of signs that gains meaning through its relationships with other signs. The structuralist approach posits that these structures are not merely arbitrary but are fundamental to understanding the complexities of human experience.One of the key tenets of structuralist theory is the idea that meaning is derived from the differences between elements within a system rather than from any intrinsic quality of those elements. For instance, in literature, a structuralist critic might analyze a text by examining the relationships between characters, plot devices, and themes, rather than focusing solely on the author's intentions or the historical context. This method allows for a more objective analysis, revealing how various components interact to produce meaning.The influence of structuralist thought can be seen across various disciplines beyond literature, including anthropology, sociology, and psychology. In anthropology, Claude Lévi-Strauss applied structuralist principles to the study of myths and kinship systems, suggesting that underlying structures govern the way societies organize themselves and make sense of the world. Similarly, in sociology, structuralist perspectives have informed theories about social institutions and their roles in shaping individual behavior.However, the structuralist approach has not been without its critics. Post-structuralists argue that structuralist theories often overlook the fluidity and instability of meaning, suggesting that interpretations can vary widely based on context and individual perspective. They contend that meaning is not fixed within a structure but is constantly negotiated and redefined. This critique has led to the development of more dynamic frameworks for understanding culture and language, which take into account the complexities of power, identity, and subjectivity.Despite these criticisms, the structuralist framework remains a valuable tool for analysis. It encourages scholars and students alike to look beyond surface-level interpretations and consider the deeper connections that inform our understanding of texts and cultural phenomena. By recognizing the structural components that underlie our experiences, we can gain greater insight into the ways in which meaning is constructed and communicated.In conclusion, the concept of structuralist theory invites us to engage with the intricate webs of meaning that shape our lives. Whether we are analyzing a piece of literature, a cultural artifact, or a social practice, adopting a structuralist lens allows us to uncover the hidden structures that influence our perceptions and interactions. As we continue to explore the complexities of human culture, the structuralist approach provides a foundational understanding that enriches our analyses and broadens our horizons.

在文学理论和文化研究领域，术语结构主义者指的是一种批判性的方法，强调塑造人类文化、语言和思想的潜在结构。这种观点出现在20世纪中叶，受到语言学家费迪南德·德·索绪尔的著作的重大影响，他认为语言是一个符号系统，通过与其他符号的关系获得意义。结构主义者的方法认为，这些结构不仅仅是任意的，而是理解人类经验复杂性的基础。结构主义者理论的一个关键原则是，意义来自于系统内元素之间的差异，而不是这些元素的任何内在特质。例如，在文学中，结构主义者批评家可能通过考察角色、情节装置和主题之间的关系来分析文本，而不是仅仅关注作者的意图或历史背景。这种方法允许更客观的分析，揭示各种组件如何相互作用以产生意义。结构主义者思想的影响可以在文学之外的多个学科中看到，包括人类学、社会学和心理学。在人类学中，克劳德·列维-斯特劳斯将结构主义者原则应用于神话和亲属系统的研究，认为潜在的结构支配着社会组织和理解世界的方式。同样，在社会学中，结构主义者的视角也为关于社会机构及其在塑造个人行为中的角色的理论提供了依据。然而，结构主义者的方法并非没有批评者。后结构主义者认为，结构主义者理论往往忽视意义的流动性和不稳定性，认为解释可以根据上下文和个人视角有很大变化。他们主张，意义并不是固定在某个结构中，而是不断协商和重新定义的。这种批评导致了更具动态框架的发展，以理解文化和语言，考虑权力、身份和主体性的复杂性。尽管存在这些批评，结构主义者框架仍然是分析的有价值工具。它鼓励学者和学生超越表面层次的解释，考虑影响我们对文本和文化现象理解的更深层次的联系。通过认识到潜在的结构成分，我们可以更深入地洞察意义是如何构建和传达的。总之，结构主义者理论的概念邀请我们参与塑造我们生活的复杂意义网络。无论我们是在分析一部文学作品、一件文化艺术品，还是一种社会实践，采用结构主义者的视角都使我们能够揭示影响我们感知和互动的隐含结构。随着我们继续探索人类文化的复杂性，结构主义者的方法提供了一种基础理解，丰富了我们的分析，拓宽了我们的视野。